Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 113

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Tue, 24 February 2009 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7463A6B01 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4a2grjIOh5dV for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965573A6AFD for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so2078413yxm.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YvMThIlitgTOTS7OWAk21PHl/jUymRTGUFfFi7mwg5Q=; b=YNkUiDjici/IG0fTgJ179tJGHfCqA++MXaGVZkCOlL04i0E+wOem28rJppESx1LvAr FkxRfkC8WdwLXyPTNaJqtLoXmneexl/FtSnNU8RIcdGkw5fi+j7xVifkywN9UkJSkXtp YewIH9vQ/zepcN8VlUkbsrjC8EQwNGYyizeoU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VFAeC1p2jLkFUqFAS7l0KcatVg2lWG/tbKEuETU3wwBQEoXsiFl55wE23RE+kLtuTs HonuYzd6REPHdc0raiP9qQYd1mgUi1E/AkYwVzocFITtMt1LDooIl1LJv2RW039YJUpf MZzAM5GyboRmzaEt99iqWZYiKciv+8f5U0T28=
Received: by 10.100.43.14 with SMTP id q14mr2736846anq.60.1235439439174; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.168.111? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b32sm1169896ana.55.2009.02.23.17.37.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A34F4C.8090800@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:16 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
References: <20090223.202313.9421.0@webmail20.vgs.untd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090223.202313.9421.0@webmail20.vgs.untd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 113
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:37:02 -0000

dyerbrookme@juno.com wrote:
> "It's great that we're all interoperable now! woot! We love finally being able to download and upload our inventories from other worlds and also populating our barren servers with all 
It is my understanding that the current proposal does not even transfer 
inventory at all; it just transfers a representation of inventory. The 
current proposal is for a system where downloading and uploading of 
inventories between different servers is neither necessary nor specified.

Sincerely,

jw