Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 13 May 2013 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC1821F90F1 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYwkHxd8eLJu for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8B821F90DF for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bPGM1l0061ei1Bg54T12yL; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:01:02 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bT121l0113ZTu2S3kT12tb; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:01:02 +0000
Message-ID: <5191002D.2000007@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:01:01 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36B485@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DEF4B@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <CABcZeBMrgaHGXFi_NRk+znsT-AGnRS5EDLgFhZgGA+VG81BhZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW=4zNgauXc-=pv9j9zGdVntmb=K22wcRr77wfQc-6J3w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBODcyo-JXqs6EZ-F5BY_TaM94+eu+UqNApFnTNjpehUzA@mail.gmail.com> <518D73E4.4090609@alum.mit.edu> <9D12C4E8-F7C1-4D32-A8AC-570AC86ACA23@vidyo.com> <518D9361.7060301@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36EC03@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36EC03@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1368457262; bh=SEGb1ucQLS81JSkRr1GNDBiYDytkLbWZnYGPLDxJw40=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=g97Cgjgosa8sHmwLCX2KcK7lHFzo/SYwaCxLhlDZ1Px8RIpZFT6yypl1R5RtzOJeG XdXV2blZZhPhXnB9tCF0d08giO+bIczUIT8qx2xov3n2mqwXsADqV1/lPRLbyhWeDA 8pIubdY5ahRC+P7L4aOUasiiqgucN+Y/tmAmNam0cWpOOFrnMvNcztaYjqpvJvNOnL Nub2q41S1CQ/JYckyIDc53S0WM6D54LVbXnn12ASAkjxBEIh3tBkjo1PRkM/xOKeZL wC0uGDJgLVhbU2yDlK1lm+NQ8AQHEm7DZJ1pnUkC5euIwvp0up73dwR/qeAxm/etbY SzvhrY1cPKhsg==
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:01:08 -0000

On 5/13/13 3:27 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, assuming we are going to update RFC 5888 (whatever the exact wording would be), would we do that within draft-bundle, or within a separate document?

That question always comes up, doesn't it?

IMO this could probably be handled in the bundle draft, since it is a 
small change and by the same wg. But it isn't my call. This question 
should be addressed by the chairs and the ADs.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: 11. toukokuuta 2013 3:40
> To: Jonathan Lennox
> Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions
>
> On 5/10/13 6:44 PM, Jonathan Lennox wrote:
>
>>>>      I struggled to find it too.  It's in 9.2:
>>>>
>>>>          SIP entities refuse media streams by setting the port to zero in the
>>>>          corresponding "m" line. "a=group" lines MUST NOT contain
>>>>          identification-tags that correspond to "m" lines with the port
>>>>      set to
>>>>          zero.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This feels like something we could relax for the offer.
>>>
>>> We could relax it. The question is if the change will break any
>>> existing use. That is a hard question to answer.
>>
>> We could say that whether it's valid must be defined by the group semantic, and for all existing group semantics it's not.
>
> WFM
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>