Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG June 17th virtual interim agenda

[Emil Ivov <[e-mail]>]

On 14.06.13, 21:10, Ari Keränen wrote:
> On 6/14/13 10:02 PM, Emil Ivov wrote:
>> On 14.06.13, 20:20, Ari Keränen wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Given the guidance from the RTCWEB WG chairs that the "no-plan"
>>> discussion should essentially happen at the RTCWEB WG, the MMUSIC
>>> interim meeting on June 17th will be focused on Plan A and Plan B.
>>
>> I assume this implies that MMUSIC considers it entirely appropriate to
>> use SDP for signalling multiple streams the way No Plan suggests (i.e.
>> one m= line can carry as many RTP flows as it likes). So much so, that
>> no further discussion is necessary on the subject.
>>
>> Could you please confirm that I am reading this properly?
>
> This means that the interim time should be used mainly to discuss plan A
> vs plan B merits, not whether RTCWEB should use A/B, or no-plan.

Sure. I get this and I find it very reasonable.

However, just as Plans A and B, No Plan says: here's an SDP that you can 
use when doing multiple streams.

So, I just want to confirm that we will not be discussing the SDP sides 
of the proposal in No Plan because they make perfect sense from an 
MMUSIC point of view and no discussion is really necessary. It'll be up 
to other working groups to decide whether they'd like to use that 
particular (and valid) approach.

Emil


-- 
https://jitsi.org