IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG June 17th virtual interim agenda

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 14 June 2013 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9CB21E8087 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3heiGKefgDhP for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AFC11E80DC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e11so2399911iej.1 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LgtjrVMmk9ch4Gsc1p53jiNgyJdrHeQHuaNnMi5toKc=; b=eCKcr7gG+tEW/J75n/TZs6k9pMXfsFT5noaY0olBpCWrafscZLydN3EEUcnBUPuOQz hiSfyKJMbL1nWThMwr6Mz+diAz08D3v15EW+kl4oblB/cCEwLHBFs0QENJ+zqAK+HZQ5 kYyVXqnATV76ZIJyp+QoQkYSmHFzu+gmrYKDYZ8HMkTPO7K3d8dAWnNdso7ShiR3nchf WyQHI1w0slmMlN5EATso/om5nPn5iv/uyAVdJO+IN1MCVgekVVTcCVGBJX8xcXpPKDuR 29Wqj6OqNxwqCKs2Y/cB+17D9ebDdsEIy0cXNjy+rTeJvygcnJM6xoVGQoJjZw6GZrau +o9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.60.3 with SMTP id d3mr1984869igr.24.1371241449340; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.49.7 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN4yuuxi6WKR-L86PQiWxQBXpAW6FFrHJaaW2Pp8Zrg5bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51BB5EFE.5090903@ericsson.com> <51BB68B2.3060104@jitsi.org> <51BB6A8C.6090400@ericsson.com> <CAHBDyN4yuuxi6WKR-L86PQiWxQBXpAW6FFrHJaaW2Pp8Zrg5bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:24:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAJh2cWbJEWb=7GGPxUAm1u1Q4FzC=Ed2EsLNFNg4w_0w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b10cbfb7d472f04df2307d9"
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG June 17th virtual interim agenda
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:24:12 -0000

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>wrote:

> O
> [MB] So what happens if RTCWEB decides that they prefer "no-plan"?  In
> that case, MMUSIC will have wasted their time deciding A versus B
> since there aren't hard requirements from other potential users of
> this SDP based multi-stream signaling mechanism.
>
>
So, RTCWEB has made a request to MMUSIC and the choice of plan A or plan B
is part of the effort to resolve that request.  RTCWEB has not withdrawn
that request.  It is always possible that work coming into one IETF working
group from another may be overcome by events, but that's not our current
state.

Please, let's move forward with the effort to resolve this, rather than
borrowing trouble.

thanks,

Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email