Re: [mpls-tp] poll to adopt draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv as a working group document

No/ do not support.

Several comments need clarification: 

1) We do not see how the content of the draft satisfies "on-demand-cv" as claimed in the title. We only see "LSP-Ping" and "LSP Traceroute" in the main part of the draft. 
In the introduction part we also see the "on-demand Connectivity Verification, Route Tracing and Adjacency functions". 
Could the authors clarify the "on-demand CV"? 

2) Could the authors clarify the purpose of describing "LSP-Ping with IP encapsulation" and "LSP Traceroute with IP encapsulation"?

The draft seems to be just a regular extension of MPLS LSP ping, not particular for MPLS-TP. Shouldn't it be a draft with the name "mpls-lsp-ping-extensions"?

B.R.
Haiyan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
To: <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; <mpls@ietf.org>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:07 PM
Subject: [mpls-tp] poll to adopt draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv as a working group document

> 
> Working Group,
> 
> this email is to start poll to adopt
> draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-00.txt
> as an MPLS working group draft.
> 
> After recent experience, the chairs would like to remind you all
> what it means to conduct a poll to adopt a draft as a working group
> draft.
> 
> - Please recall that the IETF does not "vote." Polls of a working
>   group are to gather information to help the chairs make their
>   decisions. Voting is not part of the normal working methods of
>   an IETF working group.
> 
> - The "rough consensus" process used in the working group assumes
>   that people expressing opinions are also participating in the
>   development of standards documents.
> 
> - Subscription to the list specifically to express an opinion is
>   noticed by the chairs who has access to information on the new list
>   members. Such behavior is not part of the normal working methods.
> 
> - The purpose of a poll for adoption is to help the chairs understand
>   the level of support for a document (i.e. who has read it, who
>   believes it is a good starting point for working group work, who
>   will contribute to the work) and whether there are any significant
>   technical issues. Statements of objection must be backed up by
>   proper technical reasons.
> 
> So please respond to this poll indicating whether you support the 
> adoption of this draft or stating your technical issues.
> 
> Please also not that this draft has after a discussion with the
> working group chairs been renamed, it was earlier know as
> draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01.
> 
> This poll ends eob July 5.
> 
> 
> Loa and George
> mpls wg co-chairs
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>                                              +46 767 72 92 13
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp