IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll to adopt draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv as a working group document

Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net> Mon, 21 June 2010 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nitinb@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023423A6A86; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.675, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BfDtPV85wN6T; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com (exprod7og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED753A67D3; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTB+WlZTkI4bgCHHVHUryNE1uLKFZOXaW@postini.com; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:43:12 PDT
Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:40:32 -0700
From: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:40:31 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll to adopt draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv as a working group document
Thread-Index: AcsROj6u3kMHeN8vQ86YBKdOfRzTmgAEhYHAAAUIaEU=
Message-ID: <C844E40F.10D19%nitinb@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <238542D917511A45B6B8AA806E875E2501B003D2@XMB-RCD-201.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll to adopt draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv as a working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:43:07 -0000

Support.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Loa Andersson
> Sent: 21 June 2010 08:08
> To: mpls-tp@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> Subject: [mpls] poll to adopt draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv as a
> working group document
> 
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> this email is to start poll to adopt
> draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-00.txt
> as an MPLS working group draft.
> 
> After recent experience, the chairs would like to remind you all what it
> means to conduct a poll to adopt a draft as a working group draft.
> 
> - Please recall that the IETF does not "vote." Polls of a working
>    group are to gather information to help the chairs make their
>    decisions. Voting is not part of the normal working methods of
>    an IETF working group.
> 
> - The "rough consensus" process used in the working group assumes
>    that people expressing opinions are also participating in the
>    development of standards documents.
> 
> - Subscription to the list specifically to express an opinion is
>    noticed by the chairs who has access to information on the new list
>    members. Such behavior is not part of the normal working methods.
> 
> - The purpose of a poll for adoption is to help the chairs understand
>    the level of support for a document (i.e. who has read it, who
>    believes it is a good starting point for working group work, who
>    will contribute to the work) and whether there are any significant
>    technical issues. Statements of objection must be backed up by
>    proper technical reasons.
> 
> So please respond to this poll indicating whether you support the
> adoption of this draft or stating your technical issues.
> 
> Please also not that this draft has after a discussion with the working
> group chairs been renamed, it was earlier know as
> draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01.
> 
> This poll ends eob July 5.
> 
> 
> Loa and George
> mpls wg co-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email