Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field

Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net> Tue, 19 August 2008 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26C83A67EC; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FE43A67EC for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NyVdbhXkeJgJ for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.tcb.net (dog.tcb.net [64.78.150.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491223A6765 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dog.tcb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 49F5626866A; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:21:41 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pmac.castlepoint.net (71-215-92-55.hlrn.qwest.net [71.215.92.55]) (authenticated-user smtp) (TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA 128/128) by dog.tcb.net with SMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:21:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from shane@castlepoint.net)
X-Avenger: version=0.7.8; receiver=dog.tcb.net; client-ip=71.215.92.55; client-port=3424; syn-fingerprint=65535:55:1:64:M1460,N,W3,N,N,T,S MacOS 10.4.8; data-bytes=0
Message-Id: <FE3F07B3-2604-4A1A-A4A2-B26434E9DE96@castlepoint.net>
From: Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net>
To: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4CF528C.612B%swallow@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:21:24 -0600
References: <C4CF528C.612B%swallow@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org

Yes.

-shane


On Aug 18, 2008, at 2:23 PM, George Swallow wrote:

> During the last call on "EXP field" renamed to  "CoS Field"
> draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-04.txt, there were comments on
> alternatives to the name COS.
>
> This message initiates a two week poll on whether the name COS
> is good enough, or if some other name is needed.  The poll closes
> 23:59 Sept 1 GMT.
>
> Please answer with a simple yes or no.  You may send any additional  
> comment
> in a separate message (with a different subject line).
>
> ...George
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls