Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field

Jiang Yuan-long <yljiang@huawei.com> Tue, 19 August 2008 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448163A699C; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C8B3A6880 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.244
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.244 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.354, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSCRLDW8IYFc for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A70B3A699C for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K5U00ILCIDXUT@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for mpls@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:25:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K5U00MCZIDX3P@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for mpls@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:25:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from j59929 ([10.70.77.69]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K5U0088SIDVEC@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for mpls@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:25:09 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:25:03 +0800
From: Jiang Yuan-long <yljiang@huawei.com>
To: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
Message-id: <00c101c901ee$39751b30$454d460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <C4CF528C.612B%swallow@cisco.com>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org

yes.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Swallow" <swallow@cisco.com>
To: <mpls@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:23 AM
Subject: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field


> During the last call on "EXP field" renamed to  "CoS Field"
> draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-04.txt, there were comments on
> alternatives to the name COS.
>
> This message initiates a two week poll on whether the name COS
> is good enough, or if some other name is needed.  The poll closes
> 23:59 Sept 1 GMT.
>
> Please answer with a simple yes or no.  You may send any additional 
> comment
> in a separate message (with a different subject line).
>
> ...George
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls