Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)
Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl> Tue, 19 August 2008 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBE53A68AE; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600C23A68AE for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.723
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.553, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7MMDZY+1+rI for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep28-int.chello.at (viefep28-int.chello.at [62.179.121.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD3F3A66B4 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.17.2] (really [24.132.228.153]) by viefep31-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080819191233.UAZX12911.viefep31-int.chello.at@[192.168.17.2]> for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:12:33 +0200
Message-ID: <48AB1B20.8020007@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:12:32 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: mpls@ietf.org
References: <6535C9CED6F87446B41D20EF170F23620E36BF@mamxm01.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <6535C9CED6F87446B41D20EF170F23620E36BF@mamxm01.ciena.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Shakespear already wrote: " What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet " Cos or TMF (Traffic Management Field) or .... Cheers, Huub. ---------------------------------------------- > Ditto. > > No to CoS, Yes to TM... > > /himanshu > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of >> John Kenney >> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:32 PM >> To: Francois Le Faucheur IMAP >> Cc: mpls@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of >> EXP field) >> >> >> My "No" vote is a vote in favor of "Traffic Management" >> >> Francois Le Faucheur IMAP wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Someone earlier suggested "Traffic Management". While it can most >>> certainly be argued this would not be a perfect name either >> (or other >>> names would be closer to "perfection"), is there a good >> argument I am >>> missing for why "COS" is obviously better (or more "good >> enough") than >>> "Traffic Management"? (considering we want to capture both Diffserv >>> and ECN/PCN use of EXP field) >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Francois >>> >>> >>> On 18 Aug 2008, at 22:23, George Swallow wrote: >>> >>>> During the last call on "EXP field" renamed to "CoS Field" >>>> draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-04.txt, there were comments on >>>> alternatives to the name COS. >>>> >>>> This message initiates a two week poll on whether the name COS >>>> is good enough, or if some other name is needed. The poll closes >>>> 23:59 Sept 1 GMT. >>>> >>>> Please answer with a simple yes or no. You may send any >> additional >>>> comment >>>> in a separate message (with a different subject line). >>>> >>>> ...George >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpls mailing list >>>> mpls@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpls mailing list >>> mpls@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> mpls@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >> > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > -- ================================================================ http://www.van-helvoort.eu/ ================================================================ Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else... _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Santiago Alvarez (saalvare)
- [mpls] discussion (was Re: Poll on renaming of EX… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [mpls] discussion (was Re: Poll on renaming o… George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Cao Wei
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field HENDERICKX Wim
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Harshith Shetty
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field jordan.britnell
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Jiang Yuan-long
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Matthew Meyer
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Tomohiro Otani
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Santanu.Ganguly
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field BOCCI Matthew
- Re: [mpls] discussion (was Re: Poll on renaming o… Shahram Davari
- [mpls] Question for clarification (was RE: Poll o… Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field phani bandaru
- Re: [mpls] Question for clarification (was RE: Po… Diego Caviglia
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field buyukkoc
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] Question for clarification (was RE: Po… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Shahram Davari
- [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on rena… Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Peter Tomsu
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field John Kenney
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … John Kenney
- [mpls] FW: Poll on renaming of EXP field Howard Green
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … David Allan
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Peng He
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Vijayanand C
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Tom Petch
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Daniele Ceccarelli
- [mpls] Discuss of EXP field Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Discuss of EXP field Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Moshe Ashkenazi
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Vullo, Anthony D (Tony)
- Re: [mpls] FW: Poll on renaming of EXP field Vadali, Somayajulu (Somu)
- [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field mushaoxing 63008
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field saquib khan
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Annamaria Fulignoli
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Andrew Sergeev
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Michael Lyngbøl
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Ben Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Don Fedyk