Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)

Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl> Tue, 19 August 2008 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBE53A68AE; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600C23A68AE for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.723
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.553, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7MMDZY+1+rI for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep28-int.chello.at (viefep28-int.chello.at [62.179.121.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD3F3A66B4 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.17.2] (really [24.132.228.153]) by viefep31-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080819191233.UAZX12911.viefep31-int.chello.at@[192.168.17.2]> for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:12:33 +0200
Message-ID: <48AB1B20.8020007@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:12:32 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: mpls@ietf.org
References: <6535C9CED6F87446B41D20EF170F23620E36BF@mamxm01.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <6535C9CED6F87446B41D20EF170F23620E36BF@mamxm01.ciena.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org

Shakespear already wrote:
" What's in a name? That which we call a rose
by any other name would smell as sweet "

Cos or TMF (Traffic Management Field) or ....

Cheers, Huub.
----------------------------------------------

> Ditto.
> 
> No to CoS, Yes to TM...
> 
> /himanshu
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
>> John Kenney
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:32 PM
>> To: Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
>> Cc: mpls@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of
>> EXP field)
>>
>>
>> My "No" vote is a vote in favor of "Traffic Management"
>>
>> Francois Le Faucheur IMAP wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Someone earlier suggested "Traffic Management". While it can most 
>>> certainly be argued this would not be a perfect name either 
>> (or other 
>>> names would be closer to "perfection"), is there a good 
>> argument I am 
>>> missing for why "COS" is obviously better (or more "good 
>> enough") than 
>>> "Traffic Management"? (considering we want to capture both Diffserv 
>>> and ECN/PCN use of EXP field)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Francois
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18 Aug 2008, at 22:23, George Swallow wrote:
>>>
>>>> During the last call on "EXP field" renamed to  "CoS Field"
>>>> draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-04.txt, there were comments on
>>>> alternatives to the name COS.
>>>>
>>>> This message initiates a two week poll on whether the name COS
>>>> is good enough, or if some other name is needed.  The poll closes
>>>> 23:59 Sept 1 GMT.
>>>>
>>>> Please answer with a simple yes or no.  You may send any 
>> additional 
>>>> comment
>>>> in a separate message (with a different subject line).
>>>>
>>>> ...George
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mpls mailing list
>>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list
>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

-- 
================================================================
                   http://www.van-helvoort.eu/
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls