Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 06 January 2017 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5279F1296A7 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:19:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qFLPvVdHDa1R for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 78780129694 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 27022 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jan 2017 19:19:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2017 19:19:49 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id V7Kl1u02m2SSUrH017KoAF; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:19:49 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=YpOcGeoX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=UhZ_bx4VlhqUxePa0sgA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=Sbs7aBm93X4A:10 a=giq7N5chJRQA:10 a=kIC1wz410uMA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=9hzDq+rnEngyzkENXRgyfaifPahliVMpCROghvUyfbo=; b=dww0OB8/WM9Ow57XJcY986Rjo0 NZ8VF5KjPassK+0z1Ybn5SNVEMdTWPmnxYz4lpD4s8m9cfFSCymCCoNUTAp44fwviNTmo0k36sR4n PrTPwfUv+RnuQz/1/BWTaaYAB;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:45837 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cPa3F-0005py-BF; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:19:45 -0700
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <148302624729.30218.3797301462532090032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e2da432a-1ed8-fd51-be59-70213cd932f6@dcrocker.net> <be74a492-a414-1947-91cc-f8eafabd57f8@cisco.com> <31e61662-a92e-dbdc-f918-d91c5694420b@labn.net> <ac68caa4-a6da-9eb0-d7cb-41ccab444e81@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <947fc52f-ca71-1ff1-19f5-fc81e1e1fe2c@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:19:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ac68caa4-a6da-9eb0-d7cb-41ccab444e81@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1cPa3F-0005py-BF
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.85.191]:45837
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/5X26H8OSiEqzVhpuWJIyc_Qn_y0>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:19:51 -0000

Elliot,

Thanks for the response.

On 1/6/2017 1:13 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>  I don't really know the composition of the meetings
> committee, but it seems to me that perhaps that is a place for a certain
> amount of diversity so that concerns can be identified early.  

Just fyi:

subcomittee membership can be found at
https://iaoc.ietf.org/committees.html#meetings

also there was a call for volunteers not too long ago, see [1], and I'd
expect to see annually going forward.

Lou

[1]
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg15684.html