IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 29 January 2017 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B94D129404 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:30:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJEwKGLg-HU3 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52502129400 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 194so28435248pgd.0 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:30:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xvHOx8oEDi4SOWQ8LKjndZZydOxOZ0+J7ipq0ydhXNY=; b=unlV5mCR08BmO+LP7rUt2pR+UkgDW3mRQTfXe4kVzoSOBcZGeb5eCJNfQHqOD2UsQs 4kmvarh0ovaLUKuW9MegDvqeOWKD8ODC8h6pKgYIiTJqzux1nMAuNuenVFN8DMO+Tex8 zS5eQqKhQAxXJspqsqvvJOZsiZewcea1KsHpHDgWBZJoh4r3IKlwiuAGrvAwU6S46Exf mDP02W0tGLlDTnMIbdVzUiUgF/2jGJBiWgg6hwLIDtonjiiqYccqZapKj+p4gbjHlHmQ bVvaYQjyuCYvpEHjLuVEMF2YDhXKVdAe1bh9rqfXSycsSTVtpSi5sJ0+Ells3K9lYLlI NUYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xvHOx8oEDi4SOWQ8LKjndZZydOxOZ0+J7ipq0ydhXNY=; b=T+fe1SwW6dDTDJsWBH+CYF+mvSV4IudfWsi8QIk5zgBqYbYrte10RJZEYO5nZTWFKR auOMHj0RQzEMNa3daPokLve79bPmAeNeXgNnP7imuug+A3MAa7y4YN/RQEuknKQ2IToy Zz3B8/6Y/RXPUzxCd/leTQFRCtpoHIf5YQxksI6vFc4XZ393etmW3NjAouyUvs50prtp ZwyoPdGoXUqQJviLm4Zoqdl+DZeBc3Gf1PcYf2Bgr/2eIfo9y04MMAtORWrA0v0uljlr LyjiyXEENTkte8KzlpNvN0oyUBycVBHB/oJPgrDUfmjN5qNJpzstVNKWQIWFD4HM9F5O WyBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKjxnTS5o9JfNvE+nf+AfShKdr/elTaAKwCYt8cBCSrny2hHfmv/1QrMRWf60crHg==
X-Received: by 10.98.57.154 with SMTP id u26mr16857169pfj.136.1485660619676; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.113.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p26sm21874776pgn.39.2017.01.28.19.30.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:30:18 -0800 (PST)
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <d064ed7c-abf6-68e6-584d-03d5354ee09f@nomountain.net> <1827bf44-e4d9-f436-e9d1-19da74029bfb@cisco.com> <a10c850a-9a95-fb77-5d99-931a08c38a32@dcrocker.net> <26a07748-4cfc-ba42-e3e8-d08b153ce10d@gmail.com> <a103fecb-42d6-c509-f861-7d9f8e2844d7@cisco.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <eac54506-bcec-7937-917e-93ec7fb50205@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:30:14 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a103fecb-42d6-c509-f861-7d9f8e2844d7@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/s1wWNliR-d8iM5eiz8vSq4Rx3XQ>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 03:30:21 -0000

On 29/01/2017 02:22, Eliot Lear wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/27/17 8:07 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> "While this document uses these terms and these meanings, it remains the
>> responsibility of the IAOC to apply their best judgment.  Any appeals
>> remain subject to the provisions of [RFC4071]."
>>
> 
> I think it amounts to the same thing.  I'm just being explicit.  Here's
> the relevant text:
> 
>    In no circumstances may the IAB or
>    ISOC Board of Trustees overturn a decision of the IAOC that involves
>    a binding contract or overturn a personnel-related action (such as
>    hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, performance reviews, salary
>    adjustments, etc.).

I think we agree on the substance. I am just leery about this document
restating things that are formally defined by an existing BCP.

The point about telling the NomCom your concerns about past nominees or
present candidates should be engraved on the archway at the entrance to the IETF.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email