IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 06 January 2017 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD042129D02 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:01:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfpPOO-MzGIE for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:01:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C38C2129B73 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:01:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v06H2hwx007354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:02:43 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1483722163; bh=uIThSwVDctqByux0he8y7nIJu/C3T7Oc5dtmh/2dN4U=; h=Subject:To:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=YUpBhRU/cRUaXuOSzOFHnNnOEQATjMCADqg1tN72T65t6u4Q3rJUaA516cm0ZHQhz iMLJQdrRXIZkuuaoW9M/EWAdJlcuVmpMEc/CbfHvaq5C6rZeb6JKMh4GVHJgk+Dl02 UtGXgc6i5ZH1MsRRe+qznhQ1+kjYQVuVSIoUEv2o=
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <148302624729.30218.3797301462532090032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e2da432a-1ed8-fd51-be59-70213cd932f6@dcrocker.net> <be74a492-a414-1947-91cc-f8eafabd57f8@cisco.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <833c9d78-a89d-4aac-9b9a-c1cfb275d82a@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 09:01:08 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <be74a492-a414-1947-91cc-f8eafabd57f8@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/LGOq5nlo56CT384EIMv98OiuJdg>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:01:25 -0000

On 1/6/2017 8:40 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> At the end of the day, if members of the
> community are unhappy with the IAOC's venue selections, the appropriate
> recourse is the NOMCOM and not some sort of appeal.  I would like this
> further clarified in the document.


ack. suggested text, please...

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email