IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 28 January 2017 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414081294EE for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 05:22:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmDXYmzKZ3Mm for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 05:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7B41294E1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 05:22:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2294; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485609747; x=1486819347; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=uinzdrTkONKm66jFtWPNOqFA5Rt/v6FOtlIqn1Q2iSM=; b=YhksuYFmudYnk+fPW6dP6vHdZpdC8DbaGg7lhI+Y9SuTnS79jecNSlAp dd5f3P4gWuC776wnDvoCC7svSgshnb5GWeV5p1E/zKOs9TZcaZSkFSGPE LFiepUXGvMf0hJFOrRk/wX4+AgUhXsYnqMe27b6luAermqlboAFyhh3W9 M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D0AQBnmYxY/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhF6ENIoJcpEQlTKCDIYiAoJhGAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGoBBSNmCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBiWCsbYIlinoBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQETD4hQgmqHT4JAHwWbVINvggOMCYFhiFeGP5J/HziBGxMIFRWGdT+JKgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,301,1477958400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="652042994"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2017 13:22:25 +0000
Received: from [10.61.211.57] ([10.61.211.57]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0SDMPUO007829; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 13:22:25 GMT
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <d064ed7c-abf6-68e6-584d-03d5354ee09f@nomountain.net> <1827bf44-e4d9-f436-e9d1-19da74029bfb@cisco.com> <a10c850a-9a95-fb77-5d99-931a08c38a32@dcrocker.net> <26a07748-4cfc-ba42-e3e8-d08b153ce10d@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <a103fecb-42d6-c509-f861-7d9f8e2844d7@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:22:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <26a07748-4cfc-ba42-e3e8-d08b153ce10d@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rKtJMIHdE4un7p1ci9WHA1r8qDHlHjJUv"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/H6Ti5hyqBhPfgcMPhTP_vyIBZOU>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 13:22:29 -0000


On 1/27/17 8:07 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> "While this document uses these terms and these meanings, it remains the
> responsibility of the IAOC to apply their best judgment.  Any appeals
> remain subject to the provisions of [RFC4071]."
>

I think it amounts to the same thing.  I'm just being explicit.  Here's
the relevant text:

   In no circumstances may the IAB or
   ISOC Board of Trustees overturn a decision of the IAOC that involves
   a binding contract or overturn a personnel-related action (such as
   hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, performance reviews, salary
   adjustments, etc.).


Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email