IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Fri, 27 January 2017 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EF112943A for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:00:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lp8cU3uyNVEy for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212CD124281 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e4so71175377pfg.1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:00:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3m6FMO3HWhD5VjRzMWENL3SnbGXLB8M4SijfNgY9mWI=; b=AtSIRpijF7Lll2Um9m3FdwR2XT1ZODJKDfcY2Ht0g+DI/q0xrQc7U2dMSh20cxZxXm bl5u8ym9CmvQQgkyDYONyenKP8QXO5EV+hhlUr9G0nvUZaHb6tDKAukjT8rtZRaajUWo DtLHJpeQjntgyvmkmbWO0C7gvjMtFkf+ANvB4b8hbz8UaNx4SLAtn2cG1dTfnM9ekFb6 /5v2+umSQ+/rxiftpHvEguvkk5UjNv784hpLi6y5HLx08p9mOiyOs2vufiDynEk4VDuS KL+yL1jszy1AufJsndffOF2VxmPlIufqoQqC0KqM7GkeFfBLbN7VONBrHssLxx0bSxrB 3Mdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3m6FMO3HWhD5VjRzMWENL3SnbGXLB8M4SijfNgY9mWI=; b=oheLIWZvGQEK0F0LKFar7/XgDFndu3/nELHGdl+VsxUDdi/+1AE/Urs1g5+fmmRB8N xcW6veRPLx9w21Ih4XfecpRZUpJYxQQTPGipTlG1FMku/jDXZdVNozOfStp/eVRc/al8 zkgFVhgCE3qKvhszx1euvHi2SYTEZtH85G5hDKWnhPToNulhlschIIWPyFOUOFfQliBn cDmUf9SXKluRA1VBttnkvwIsawEGzorPtD8EzqbBt0z1Yzom81zr0OuWCj9TNqKqhJBF bbwTnS/4wQeC6IVubT+pJa54+tCjKgbEOeinxDNT0qkJ/Wdd/JsDcHfkNgLn7wOAupxl YSiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ093Fab748JTLBUO0j8k/vVZ2706a0C+evVmXAybBgqB24OQh8QE7CNN0UDZ7EEA==
X-Received: by 10.99.116.22 with SMTP id p22mr7861974pgc.161.1485500419632; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:00:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-98-14-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.98.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm8149769pfa.19.2017.01.26.23.00.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:00:19 -0800 (PST)
To: lear@cisco.com, mtgvenue@ietf.org
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <d064ed7c-abf6-68e6-584d-03d5354ee09f@nomountain.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:00:12 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/5SulkcGIg7teWHqA6-FCnoFp4Sg>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:00:21 -0000

Hi, Eliot:

Do you feel that the concerns you raised asking for greater
clarity about recourse in the case of disagreement about
venue selection have been addressed satisfactorily?  (ref:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/ZdeYcXv3adpQEuPYXfAvDabki24/?qid=31d4d393cac02fc490a7dbd4b8e8db3d)

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email