Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75D212954F for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:41:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isa98iKYntmv for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:41:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70888129526 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:41:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9579911629 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:41:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXq6jbr1fNUP for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (192-0-220-231.cpe.teksavvy.com [192.0.220.231]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E62411621 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:40:48 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170131174047.GK53056@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <d064ed7c-abf6-68e6-584d-03d5354ee09f@nomountain.net> <1827bf44-e4d9-f436-e9d1-19da74029bfb@cisco.com> <a10c850a-9a95-fb77-5d99-931a08c38a32@dcrocker.net> <26a07748-4cfc-ba42-e3e8-d08b153ce10d@gmail.com> <a103fecb-42d6-c509-f861-7d9f8e2844d7@cisco.com> <eac54506-bcec-7937-917e-93ec7fb50205@gmail.com> <5e656192-ed8d-6ae8-625e-a2cd82e552f4@cisco.com> <A71C99EB-2772-4CD5-A480-2DDC9CB22FF2@piuha.net> <fa1ab38b-9dca-3555-5a20-1c35741c39c9@nomountain.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <fa1ab38b-9dca-3555-5a20-1c35741c39c9@nomountain.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/IY4yW3kQNuvY36RutqYMOYOA6Y4>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] document status, the role of the iaoc, and enforceability
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:41:05 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 08:12:45AM -0900, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 1/31/17 6:39 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > I’m fine with Brian’s text, but I’d like a small tweak:
> > 
> > "While this document uses these terms and these meanings, it remains the
> > responsibility of the IAOC to apply their best judgment. The IAOC accepts
> > input and feedback both during the consultation process and later (for instance
> > when there are changes in the situation at a chosen location). Any
> > appeals remain subject to the provisions of [RFC4071].”
> 
> Are there any objections or further tweaks to this language?

I don't exactly object, but since it refers to "these terms and these
meanings", I think we need to get clarity on the terms before I
understand what it would mean.  I think your other note therefore
needs to be answered first.

Best regards,

A


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com