IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt

badra@isima.fr Wed, 01 October 2008 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <netconf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7CE3A6811; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D973A6811 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.822, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JLZyb88RjcPG for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sp.isima.fr (sp.isima.fr [193.55.95.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00043A67A7 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.isima.fr (www-data@www.isima.fr [193.55.95.79]) by sp.isima.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m91JQgwD921742; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:26:42 +0100
Received: from 88.164.98.77 (SquirrelMail authenticated user badra) by www.isima.fr with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:25:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <56653.88.164.98.77.1222885530.squirrel@www.isima.fr>
In-Reply-To: <001901c923e5$9b2d73e0$0601a8c0@allison>
References: <50947.88.164.98.77.1222460713.squirrel@www.isima.fr><00bb01c92265$a9c7ba90$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com> <61043.88.164.98.77.1222722436.squirrel@www.isima.fr> <001301c9230c$7ed77940$0601a8c0@allison> <54288.88.164.98.77.1222791769.squirrel@www.isima.fr> <000c01c923aa$054cc6e0$0601a8c0@allison> <55201.88.164.98.77.1222865792.squirrel@www.isima.fr> <001901c923e5$9b2d73e0$0601a8c0@allison>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:25:30 +0200
From: badra@isima.fr
To: "tom.petch�" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (sp.isima.fr [193.55.95.1]); Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:26:42 +0100 (WEST)
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org

> So with netconf, why mention PSK at all? Fingerprints I would understand
> from
> parallels to syslog, PSK I do not.  And I suspect that the user who goes
> to
> RFC4279 for enlightenment will be disappointed; fine RFC but an
> explanation of
> applicability is not there, IMHO.
>
> Tom Petch

OK, so better to remove the PSK based authentication, right?
BTW, we received alike comment from Juergen, I will ask the WG members to
decide whatever to keep ot to remove this authentication mode.

Best regards
Badra
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email