Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 07 November 2017 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A5E13FB98 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 04:54:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KeEP7zcoPesW for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 04:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FDBD13FDCB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 04:54:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3322; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1510059271; x=1511268871; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=/jkzNKOb2/PJpNwNtsBkBoPCwEnQG9xqtpORLQid02g=; b=AnZFmuMFNUM6GZz82yM92UG52P+JxJYwX+i/lUKtBFTazp2JsZkqeFai upL21ToOTDd+QWQ32HUOgG+EtQ4H8g+3/zp0ophs8smONay3RoUa/MgCG qOqsyUFOPISZCisDPBh0oXzulJmjIozuxjDR5xDTnkz02gvD20+vfOrJm k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BzAQC+rAFa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYQYbieDfYsTkCqWSBCCAQcDGAuESU8ChTUWAQEBAQEBAQEBayi?= =?us-ascii?q?FHwEBAQMBASFLGwsOCioCAicwBgEKAgYCAQGKHxCpL4InixQBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBEA+DMIVtgwGEYgESAYM0gmIFknCPHoRCgiOBAY0WghVfhSSDYIc?= =?us-ascii?q?8lhyBOSYMJYEDbTQhCB0VSYJkCYReOTaJfII1AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,358,1505779200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="120137"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2017 12:54:11 +0000
Received: from [10.61.98.123] (dhcp-10-61-98-123.cisco.com [10.61.98.123]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vA7CsASa015833; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:54:11 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <66FA526D-19AE-41C1-99FE-670F879796CA@juniper.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1cf2e28a-99e9-bbac-3cdb-2256d9040a69@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:24:10 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <66FA526D-19AE-41C1-99FE-670F879796CA@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6ITBRa3ELka1IohAvcJh352GAA4DnMtEB"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jHFrlsaPrajKQSCWMzQh4DoBUv0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 12:54:33 -0000

Kent,

Can you or the chairs please summarize what issues need to be
addressed?  We are in a place where we end up in endless last calls, and
that is bad.

Eliot


On 11/7/17 12:46 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> This closes the Last Call on this document.  There is
> clearly a lot of interest in the publication of an ACL
> model, but there also seems to be significant concern
> for how this model is structured.  It seems that we need
> to spend some more time to ensure the current structure
> is okay.  Based on the result of this discussion, we
> will then judge if this Last Call was successful of not.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent // shepherd
>
>
> --
>
> All,
>
> This starts a two-week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14.
>
> The working group last call ends on November 3.
> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>
> Could the authors, explicitly CC-ed on this email, please
> also confirm at this time that they are unaware of any 
> IPR related to this draft.
>
> Thank you,
> Netmod Chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=HCp9pNO1eASC7fBxrsD4hOUjTXHbKMuWC5C2h7-ym68&s=k7uRdiuP0Z8vvDa1hOLxdQJQt3MBpHv8gcuHg9hy-Lw&e=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>