Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011

"Erasani, Pranoop" <Pranoop.Erasani@netapp.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <Pranoop.Erasani@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E593A6B93 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.873
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.873 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.671, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wH4bLP3zd38w for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A1B3A6863 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.57,317,1283756400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="466042553"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2010 16:53:45 -0700
Received: from svlrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (svlrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.57.115.30]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o9BNrjG6024070 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACMVEXC3-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.99.115.21]) by svlrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:53:45 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB699F.8A691141"
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:53:45 -0700
Message-ID: <43EEF8704A569749804F545E3306FCE30945D743@SACMVEXC3-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011
Thread-Index: Actpkmyt6QRjoDHsTRWABx+O/01+7gADEdau
References: <9C0FE01C-2ECC-468D-AC32-524191536058@netapp.com> <55D5676A-E5CE-4BF6-82D9-C21B7D44CAAE@netapp.com>
From: "Erasani, Pranoop" <Pranoop.Erasani@netapp.com>
To: "Haynes, Tom" <Thomas.Haynes@netapp.com>, <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2010 23:53:45.0385 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A754990:01CB699F]
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:52:34 -0000

 


So why don't we gather some data:

> 1) Do you plan to attend the June 2011 BAT if it is in Paris?
 
No.

> 2) Do you plan to attend the June 2011 BAT if it is at CITI?
 
Yes. I'd say most likely. But other factors will be considered, once we come close to the date.

> 3) If you said yes to both, which one do you think you would get
the most worth from?
 
N/A.

> 4) Did you attend the June 2010 BAT at CITI?
 
Yes.
 
- Pranoop

I'm asking you to answer as an individual and not as a company. But
please remember you need to secure funding from your company.
I.e., don't say yes to Paris because you want to visit it, say yes if
you know you will most likely be present. Also, if normally two of
you from your company attend and you know that your management
will only support one going to Paris, please reflect that in your
responses.

If you don't feel comfortable replying to list, just send your reply to me.


_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4