Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011
"Mike Eisler" <mre-ietf@eisler.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 14:05 UTC
Return-Path: <mre-ietf@eisler.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5866C3A6A32 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_AFFORDABLE=1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rP5BujKPMKJc for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postalmail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D9B3A6A29 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.eisler.com (ahfbbjcaiaae.dreamhost.com [75.119.208.4]) by postalmail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD4AABF2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 75.70.233.8 (proxying for 75.70.233.8) (SquirrelMail authenticated user mre-ietf@eisler.com) by webmail.eisler.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:06:14 -0700
Message-ID: <9af8934019c8f3d84432b005ce087796.squirrel@webmail.eisler.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CB30E70.3080200@RedHat.com>
References: <9C0FE01C-2ECC-468D-AC32-524191536058@netapp.com> <4CB30E70.3080200@RedHat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:06:14 -0700
From: Mike Eisler <mre-ietf@eisler.com>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:05:04 -0000
I get that as a WG in an international standards body with customers and employees spread across the world that having a testing event outside of the USA would be good. However, there are significant costs for doing so, especially if equipment heavier than laptops is involved. I suggest amortizing travel costs to align with an IETF meeting (most of much are no longer in the USA). http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html does not show Paris as future venue, though there are several European meetings planned with TBD as the venue. So unless Oracle wants to host a bake-a-thon in Prague next spring, I think we are going to Ann Arbor and Sunnyvale next year. On Mon, October 11, 2010 6:17 am, Steve Dickson wrote: > On 10/07/2010 02:06 PM, Thomas Haynes wrote: >> We've discussed potential venues for having 2 BakeAThons in 2011. >> >> The dates would be in the middle of June and the start of October. >> >> There are two different proposals: >> >> 1) >> >> June: EMC, Paris, France >> Oct: NetApp, Sunnyvale, CA >> >> 2) >> >> June: CITI, Ann Arbor, MI >> Oct: NetApp, Sunnyvale, CA > Having the it at CITI makes it much more feasible... IMHO.. > > From a strictly Red Hat point of view, its much easier and > affordable for us to send one person to CITI and have > two people participating verses sending two people to Paris > France, along with equipment... > >> >> We are seeing increased demand to host the event in Europe and it should >> be feasible to do so once every 2 years. Between 20 - 25% of our >> participants >> are based on the other side of the Atlantic. We might also draw in >> additional >> testers and we all know once an organization gets a taste of testing, >> they >> tend to continue attending. > So are most of the 20 to 25% based out of Paris? If it was held in Paris, > what would be percentage of people travelling out of country? Meaning > would > only 75 to 80% would have to travelling out of country or would that > percentage go up to 90 to 95%? If its the latter I see no reason > to move it... > > My two cents... > > steved. > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > -- Mike Eisler, Senior Technical Director, NetApp, 719 599 9026, http://blogs.netapp.com/eislers_nfs_blog/
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Mkrtchyan, Tigran
- [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in 2011 Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Benny Halevy
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Steve Dickson
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Mike Eisler
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… david.noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Erasani, Pranoop
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Benny Halevy
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… David Rhodus
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Mkrtchyan, Tigran
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Trond Myklebust
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Rick Macklem
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Benny Halevy
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Sorin Faibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Erasani, Pranoop
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Sandeep Joshi
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Steve Dickson
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Potential schedules for BakeAThons in… Tigran Mkrtchyan