Re: [NGO] NETCONF Data Modeling BoF (NDM) proposal

Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Andy Bierman píše v St 12. 09. 2007 v 12:17 -0700:
>> I don't think that many people know RelaxNG.
>> When <appinfo> and <documentation> type of clauses are included,
>> it isn't so clean anymore.  It may be just as hard to learn for
> 
> RELAX NG allows application-specific info and documentation (in foreign
> namespaces) to be directly included in the schema, without any (clumsy)
> encapsulating elements. Here is an example:
> http://www.flowmon.org/flowmon-probe/devel/config/flowmon-rng/
> (this HTML was compiled directly from a valid RELAX NG schema via XSLT)
> 

Although a very nice example,
I actually prefer XSD to RelaxNG (XML syntax).
That's probably because I spent the time to study XSD
in detail, but not RelaxNG.  I think somebody new to both
would not think either one was easy.

>> people as XSD.  It doesn't really deal with any NETCONF-specific
>> issues (like max-access and conceptual tables) any more than XSD.
> 
> Maybe not, but at least it is relatively simple, extensible and based on
> a sound mathematical basis (labelled tree automata). See also
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00217.html
> 
> Lada
> 

Andy

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo