Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD6A28C311 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id srzr9CKcWtPM for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA6328C131 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so700245wyb.31 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:46:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.169.83 with SMTP id m61mr2952633wel.186.1266943608816; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:46:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:46:46 -0800
Message-ID: <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e65879fcc104e80480474b1b"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:44:50 -0000

What, no feedback? C'mon, peeps!

A bit of an update though:

* We have a tentative time slot of Tuesday (March 23rd) evening (1740-1940 /
5:40pm-7:40pm) Pacific Time. The final schedule will not be announced until
the 26th, however.

* That also gives us two hours, which means we aren't quite as constrained.

I would lean towards beefing up time spent for issue bashing on the three
active drafts (intro, foundation, type system) and the "presentations"
(deployment patterns, cable beach, accessibility, what's not...). Opinions?


On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote:

> Please get out your slings and arrows - it's time to bash the agenda for
> the upcoming face-to-face meeting next month in Anaheim.
>
> We asked for a 90 minute session, so we should probably plan on dropping
> (from the list below) discussion of drafts which are not looking at
> submissions to the IESG in the next few months to dedicate more time for
> active work on the issues in the shorter term drafts (intro/foundation/type
> system). Also, if you'd previously proposed a topic and I did not include
> it, that's an oversight on my part not an intentional deletion, so please
> re-raise the request.
>
> 2min - Mixed Reality Status Check[1]  - Joshua Bell
> 5min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry Leiba,
> Joshua Bell
> 10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals"  - Meadhbh Hamrick
> 10min - Open Issues in "Foundation"  - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark Lentczner
> 20min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System"[2] - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark
> Lentczner
> 5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"[3]  - Meadhbh Hamrick
> 5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message"  - Meadhbh
> Hamrick
> 5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine
> 5min - Cable Beach and VWRAP  - John Hurliman
> 5min - Virtual World Accessibility[4] - Katherine Mancuso
> 5min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy" Protocol)
>  - Joshua Bell
> 5min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell
>
> [1] this is NOT to diagnose/fix issues; it's simply to confirm that a
> channel is functional or not, and redirect participants appropriately
> [2] Including implementation experiences, possibly by John Hurliman
> [3] Should include discussion on OAuth
> [4] Tentative, based on the scheduling of our session
>
> Feedback appreciated:
> * What to add to the agenda
> * What to drop from the agenda
> * Time allotments/priorities
> * Overall order (I have Meadhbh/Mark on the podium for a long period of
> time; break it up a bit?)
>
>