Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 16:49 UTC
Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3CE28C302; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5zdYHsqZbisd; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC02F28C0F4; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1NGbtpE024045; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:37:55 -0500
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1NGpW6d151688; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:51:32 -0500
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1NGpWfj006423; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:51:32 -0300
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1NGpTRg006125; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:51:32 -0300
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 8A0AC6B1:75150A56-852576D3:005C5290; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF8A0AC6B1.75150A56-ON852576D3.005C5290-852576D3.005C9B7D@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:51:31 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 02/23/2010 11:51:31, Serialize complete at 02/23/2010 11:51:31
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005C9B7D852576D3_="
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:49:41 -0000
I'd like to include a "Foundation roadmap" discussion focused on path forward for UDP, http, long poll, websocket/hybi and such. There's been a lot of change in the space over the past year, and I think getting the issues on the table would be good. 5-10 minutes. I'll happily pull some slides together (And would love input from, say, Oh, John Hurliman who I know has some thoughts on the long poll front) - David ~ Zha From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> To: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org> Date: 02/23/2010 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77 Sent by: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org What, no feedback? C'mon, peeps! A bit of an update though: * We have a tentative time slot of Tuesday (March 23rd) evening (1740-1940 / 5:40pm-7:40pm) Pacific Time. The final schedule will not be announced until the 26th, however. * That also gives us two hours, which means we aren't quite as constrained. I would lean towards beefing up time spent for issue bashing on the three active drafts (intro, foundation, type system) and the "presentations" (deployment patterns, cable beach, accessibility, what's not...). Opinions? On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote: Please get out your slings and arrows - it's time to bash the agenda for the upcoming face-to-face meeting next month in Anaheim. We asked for a 90 minute session, so we should probably plan on dropping (from the list below) discussion of drafts which are not looking at submissions to the IESG in the next few months to dedicate more time for active work on the issues in the shorter term drafts (intro/foundation/type system). Also, if you'd previously proposed a topic and I did not include it, that's an oversight on my part not an intentional deletion, so please re-raise the request. 2min - Mixed Reality Status Check[1] - Joshua Bell 5min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell 10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals" - Meadhbh Hamrick 10min - Open Issues in "Foundation" - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark Lentczner 20min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System"[2] - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark Lentczner 5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"[3] - Meadhbh Hamrick 5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message" - Meadhbh Hamrick 5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine 5min - Cable Beach and VWRAP - John Hurliman 5min - Virtual World Accessibility[4] - Katherine Mancuso 5min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy" Protocol) - Joshua Bell 5min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell [1] this is NOT to diagnose/fix issues; it's simply to confirm that a channel is functional or not, and redirect participants appropriately [2] Including implementation experiences, possibly by John Hurliman [3] Should include discussion on OAuth [4] Tentative, based on the scheduling of our session Feedback appreciated: * What to add to the agenda * What to drop from the agenda * Time allotments/priorities * Overall order (I have Meadhbh/Mark on the podium for a long period of time; break it up a bit?) _______________________________________________ ogpx mailing list ogpx@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
- [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77 Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… David W Levine
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Mark Lentczner
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… David W Levine
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Hurliman, John
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… David W Levine
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at I… Joshua Bell