Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3CE28C302; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5zdYHsqZbisd; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC02F28C0F4; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1NGbtpE024045; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:37:55 -0500
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1NGpW6d151688; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:51:32 -0500
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1NGpWfj006423; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:51:32 -0300
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1NGpTRg006125; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:51:32 -0300
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 8A0AC6B1:75150A56-852576D3:005C5290; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF8A0AC6B1.75150A56-ON852576D3.005C5290-852576D3.005C9B7D@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:51:31 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 02/23/2010 11:51:31, Serialize complete at 02/23/2010 11:51:31
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005C9B7D852576D3_="
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:49:41 -0000

I'd like to include a "Foundation roadmap" discussion focused on path 
forward for UDP, http, long poll, websocket/hybi and such.  There's been a 
lot of change in the space over the
past year, and I think getting the issues on the table would be good. 5-10 
minutes. I'll happily pull some slides together (And would love input 
from, say, Oh, John Hurliman who I know
has some thoughts on the long poll front) 

- David
~ Zha




From:
Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To:
ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Date:
02/23/2010 11:47 AM
Subject:
Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
Sent by:
ogpx-bounces@ietf.org



What, no feedback? C'mon, peeps!

A bit of an update though:

* We have a tentative time slot of Tuesday (March 23rd) evening (1740-1940 
/ 5:40pm-7:40pm) Pacific Time. The final schedule will not be announced 
until the 26th, however.

* That also gives us two hours, which means we aren't quite as 
constrained. 

I would lean towards beefing up time spent for issue bashing on the three 
active drafts (intro, foundation, type system) and the "presentations" 
(deployment patterns, cable beach, accessibility, what's not...). 
Opinions?


On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote:
Please get out your slings and arrows - it's time to bash the agenda for 
the upcoming face-to-face meeting next month in Anaheim.

We asked for a 90 minute session, so we should probably plan on dropping 
(from the list below) discussion of drafts which are not looking at 
submissions to the IESG in the next few months to dedicate more time for 
active work on the issues in the shorter term drafts 
(intro/foundation/type system). Also, if you'd previously proposed a topic 
and I did not include it, that's an oversight on my part not an 
intentional deletion, so please re-raise the request.

2min - Mixed Reality Status Check[1]  - Joshua Bell
5min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry Leiba, 
Joshua Bell
10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals"  - Meadhbh Hamrick
10min - Open Issues in "Foundation"  - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark Lentczner
20min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System"[2] - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark 
Lentczner
5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"[3]  - Meadhbh Hamrick
5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message"  - Meadhbh 
Hamrick
5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine
5min - Cable Beach and VWRAP  - John Hurliman
5min - Virtual World Accessibility[4] - Katherine Mancuso
5min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy" Protocol) 
 - Joshua Bell
5min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell

[1] this is NOT to diagnose/fix issues; it's simply to confirm that a 
channel is functional or not, and redirect participants appropriately
[2] Including implementation experiences, possibly by John Hurliman
[3] Should include discussion on OAuth
[4] Tentative, based on the scheduling of our session

Feedback appreciated:
* What to add to the agenda
* What to drop from the agenda
* Time allotments/priorities
* Overall order (I have Meadhbh/Mark on the podium for a long period of 
time; break it up a bit?)

_______________________________________________
ogpx mailing list
ogpx@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx