Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

[Joshua Bell <[e-mail]>]

The final agenda has been published:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/77/agenda.html

Note that the time for the VWRAP session changed to Tuesday, March 23rd
09:00-11:30 Pacific. I'm pretty sure we will not use the entire 2.5-hour
slot, but it gives us more breathing room.

Can I ask all of those who are planning to attend (physically or virtually)
*and* present/lead discussions to reply on-list and confirm, and give an
updated time estimate?

I'm confirming my attendance, and believe my discussion topic ("What's not
in VWRAP") will fill about 10 minutes.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Joshua Bell <[e-mail]> wrote:

> What, no feedback? C'mon, peeps!
>
> A bit of an update though:
>
> * We have a tentative time slot of Tuesday (March 23rd) evening (1740-1940
> / 5:40pm-7:40pm) Pacific Time. The final schedule will not be announced
> until the 26th, however.
>
> * That also gives us two hours, which means we aren't quite as
> constrained.
>
> I would lean towards beefing up time spent for issue bashing on the three
> active drafts (intro, foundation, type system) and the "presentations"
> (deployment patterns, cable beach, accessibility, what's not...). Opinions?
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Joshua Bell <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Please get out your slings and arrows - it's time to bash the agenda for
>> the upcoming face-to-face meeting next month in Anaheim.
>>
>> We asked for a 90 minute session, so we should probably plan on dropping
>> (from the list below) discussion of drafts which are not looking at
>> submissions to the IESG in the next few months to dedicate more time for
>> active work on the issues in the shorter term drafts (intro/foundation/type
>> system). Also, if you'd previously proposed a topic and I did not include
>> it, that's an oversight on my part not an intentional deletion, so please
>> re-raise the request.
>>
>> 2min - Mixed Reality Status Check[1]  - Joshua Bell
>> 5min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry Leiba,
>> Joshua Bell
>> 10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals"  - Meadhbh Hamrick
>> 10min - Open Issues in "Foundation"  - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark Lentczner
>> 20min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System"[2] - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark
>> Lentczner
>> 5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"[3]  - Meadhbh Hamrick
>> 5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message"  - Meadhbh
>> Hamrick
>> 5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine
>> 5min - Cable Beach and VWRAP  - John Hurliman
>> 5min - Virtual World Accessibility[4] - Katherine Mancuso
>> 5min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy" Protocol)
>>  - Joshua Bell
>> 5min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell
>>
>> [1] this is NOT to diagnose/fix issues; it's simply to confirm that a
>> channel is functional or not, and redirect participants appropriately
>> [2] Including implementation experiences, possibly by John Hurliman
>> [3] Should include discussion on OAuth
>> [4] Tentative, based on the scheduling of our session
>>
>> Feedback appreciated:
>> * What to add to the agenda
>> * What to drop from the agenda
>> * Time allotments/priorities
>> * Overall order (I have Meadhbh/Mark on the podium for a long period of
>> time; break it up a bit?)
>>
>>
>