Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Thu, 04 March 2010 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091883A8DF8; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.733, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwrHi5kR+qhK; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (e7.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6773A8C01; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o24JHwQp002726; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:17:58 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o24JPp0K168602; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:25:51 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o24JPp6J016715; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:25:51 -0500
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o24JPpDj016707; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:25:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1003041116x31f187efg1bb1f2a3ec654c4e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002282119k46f523a8xa3d564af10bc9a97@mail.gmail.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB24EDE7@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <f72742de1003041116x31f187efg1bb1f2a3ec654c4e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 3DFC0F57:F2B09F2A-852576DC:006A101F; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF3DFC0F57.F2B09F2A-ON852576DC.006A101F-852576DC.006ABC9B@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:25:50 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 03/04/2010 14:25:50, Serialize complete at 03/04/2010 14:25:50
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006ABC9B852576DC_="
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:26:04 -0000

That looks super Josh. The first item raises a couple of quick logistical 
questions. Do we have a site in world which we
expect to use? I'm assuming we're going to be using voice, I'm also 
assuming we'll stick with 1.23.X compatible clients,
as much as it might be nice to have the 2.0 media in world. I'm looking 
forward to seeing us pull of the mixed reality
meeting. I'm also expecting some wide eyes when we take questions/comments 
from a virtual mike line. Given the
9:00 am, are we first up in the room? If so, have we looked at getting 
access to the room prior to 9:00?  And.. finally
do we have dry run plans a) pre IETF and b) before the session, in the 
actual space. (I'm willing to be there any time on
Monday we need to test stuff)


- David
~ Zha




From:
Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To:
ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Date:
03/04/2010 02:16 PM
Subject:
Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
Sent by:
ogpx-bounces@ietf.org



Thanks, folks. I did some agenda bashing after talking with several of
the topic owners, here's the latest:

2min - Mixed Reality Status Check  - Joshua Bell

10min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry
Leiba, Joshua Bell (chairs)

25min - Open Issues in "Foundation"  -  Mark Lentczner
* Including transport (EventQueue, HyBi, WebSockets, ...), road map

25min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System" - Mark Lentczner
* Including implementation experiences (Mark Lentczner, John Hurliman)

10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals"  - Meadhbh Hamrick

5min - Client-Side Capabilities - David W Levine

5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"  - Meadhbh Hamrick
* Including OAuth

15min - Cable Beach and VWRAP  - John Hurliman

5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message"  - Meadhbh 
Hamrick

5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine

15min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy"
Protocol)  - Joshua Bell

15min - Virtual World Accessibility - Katherine Mancuso
* NOTE: I don't have confirmation that Katherine will be attending;
pinging via email
* Including "making metadata accessible"

10min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell (chairs)

Reminders:
* Internet Draft final submission cut-off due 3/8 (i.e. stop revising
drafts prior to IETF77 at this point)
* Draft WG session agenda is due by 3/10 (i.e. Barry and I will submit
the above)
* Final WG session agenda is due by 3/15 (although we will bash at the
start of the session)

(See http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2010.html for the
down-to-the-minute-in-what-time-zone cut-offs.)

As always, feedback appreciated - we can still adjust the schedule to
squeeze in additional topics. Where possible, I'd like to discuss
things within the scope of the drafts (thus letting the draft editors
lead the discussion), but identifying specific sub-topics that we
should budget time for is a good thing (IMHO).
_______________________________________________
ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
ogpx@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx