Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Mon, 01 March 2010 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70B93A880F; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:50:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pjXDrTfy2jTm; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31883A8803; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:50:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o21IdwDg028082; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:39:58 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o21IoFOF176202; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:50:15 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o21IoE6C002604; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:50:14 -0300
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o21IoEiT002587; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:50:14 -0300
In-Reply-To: <45DC89A8-CBC5-48F3-A046-39B8870DA044@lindenlab.com>
References: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002282119k46f523a8xa3d564af10bc9a97@mail.gmail.com> <45DC89A8-CBC5-48F3-A046-39B8870DA044@lindenlab.com>
To: Mark Lentczner <markl@lindenlab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 229DD1C7:0894D253-852576D9:00675B41; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF229DD1C7.0894D253-ON852576D9.00675B41-852576D9.006779A3@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:50:13 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 03/01/2010 13:50:13, Serialize complete at 03/01/2010 13:50:13
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006779A2852576D9_="
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:50:56 -0000

I think the messaging topic is one we really need to get on the table. I 
*think* it may be best to break it out as a topic, rather than short other 
stuff we need to be sure we cover. 

- David
- Zha




From:
Mark Lentczner <markl@lindenlab.com>
To:
ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Date:
03/01/2010 01:46 PM
Subject:
Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
Sent by:
ogpx-bounces@ietf.org




On Feb 28, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
Can I ask all of those who are planning to attend (physically or 
virtually) *and* present/lead discussions to reply on-list and confirm, 
and give an updated time estimate?

I'm confirming my attendance, and I'm ready to present on:
10min - Open Issues in "Foundation" 
20min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System"

*IF* we want to get into the issue of client-to-server messaging (event 
queue or other methods) in this session, than the section on Foundation 
would be the place to do it, and if so, then 10 min will likely be too 
short. 20?  If there is agreement that we should work on this at the 
session, then we should get some preliminary discussion going here. 
Thoughts?

- Mark Lentczner

Mark Lentczner
Sr. Systems Architect
Technology Integration
Linden Lab

markl@lindenlab.com

Zero Linden
zero.linden@secondlife.com




_______________________________________________
ogpx mailing list
ogpx@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx