Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Thu, 04 March 2010 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED433A8C70 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:16:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.170, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxWW6DD7s5lA for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9E53A8C01 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:16:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so192649wwf.31 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:16:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.162.204 with SMTP id y54mr1047897wek.224.1267730183065; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:16:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB24EDE7@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <f72742de1002191016w5e72563cpb6f0aaaf72371915@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002230846m18e22973s1a009474008fe04d@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1002282119k46f523a8xa3d564af10bc9a97@mail.gmail.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB24EDE7@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:16:22 -0800
Message-ID: <f72742de1003041116x31f187efg1bb1f2a3ec654c4e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:16:27 -0000

Thanks, folks. I did some agenda bashing after talking with several of
the topic owners, here's the latest:

2min - Mixed Reality Status Check  - Joshua Bell

10min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry
Leiba, Joshua Bell (chairs)

25min - Open Issues in "Foundation"  -  Mark Lentczner
* Including transport (EventQueue, HyBi, WebSockets, ...), road map

25min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System" - Mark Lentczner
* Including implementation experiences (Mark Lentczner, John Hurliman)

10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals"  - Meadhbh Hamrick

5min - Client-Side Capabilities - David W Levine

5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"  - Meadhbh Hamrick
* Including OAuth

15min - Cable Beach and VWRAP  - John Hurliman

5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message"  - Meadhbh Hamrick

5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine

15min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy"
Protocol)  - Joshua Bell

15min - Virtual World Accessibility - Katherine Mancuso
* NOTE: I don't have confirmation that Katherine will be attending;
pinging via email
* Including "making metadata accessible"

10min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell (chairs)

Reminders:
* Internet Draft final submission cut-off due 3/8 (i.e. stop revising
drafts prior to IETF77 at this point)
* Draft WG session agenda is due by 3/10 (i.e. Barry and I will submit
the above)
* Final WG session agenda is due by 3/15 (although we will bash at the
start of the session)

(See http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2010.html for the
down-to-the-minute-in-what-time-zone cut-offs.)

As always, feedback appreciated - we can still adjust the schedule to
squeeze in additional topics. Where possible, I'd like to discuss
things within the scope of the drafts (thus letting the draft editors
lead the discussion), but identifying specific sub-topics that we
should budget time for is a good thing (IMHO).