Re: [ogpx] Draft Agenda for VWRAP WG Session at IETF77

[Meadhbh Hamrick <[e-mail]>]

hey josh,

i'm planning on being there. the times in the original look good.
however, i'm thinking it might be easier for the items marked
meadhbh/mark be assigned to one of us, rather than both. i would
recommend mark take foundation and abstract type system and i'll take
intro, authentication and keep the launch message.

and.. 9am? who did we offend to get the morning slot?

-cheers
-meadhbh

--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * [e-mail]



On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Joshua Bell <[e-mail]> wrote:
> The final agenda has been published:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/77/agenda.html
> Note that the time for the VWRAP session changed to Tuesday, March 23rd
> 09:00-11:30 Pacific. I'm pretty sure we will not use the entire 2.5-hour
> slot, but it gives us more breathing room.
> Can I ask all of those who are planning to attend (physically or virtually)
> *and* present/lead discussions to reply on-list and confirm, and give an
> updated time estimate?
> I'm confirming my attendance, and believe my discussion topic ("What's not
> in VWRAP") will fill about 10 minutes.
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Joshua Bell <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> What, no feedback? C'mon, peeps!
>> A bit of an update though:
>> * We have a tentative time slot of Tuesday (March 23rd) evening (1740-1940
>> / 5:40pm-7:40pm) Pacific Time. The final schedule will not be announced
>> until the 26th, however.
>> * That also gives us two hours, which means we aren't quite as
>> constrained.
>> I would lean towards beefing up time spent for issue bashing on the three
>> active drafts (intro, foundation, type system) and the "presentations"
>> (deployment patterns, cable beach, accessibility, what's not...). Opinions?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Joshua Bell <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please get out your slings and arrows - it's time to bash the agenda for
>>> the upcoming face-to-face meeting next month in Anaheim.
>>> We asked for a 90 minute session, so we should probably plan on dropping
>>> (from the list below) discussion of drafts which are not looking at
>>> submissions to the IESG in the next few months to dedicate more time for
>>> active work on the issues in the shorter term drafts (intro/foundation/type
>>> system). Also, if you'd previously proposed a topic and I did not include
>>> it, that's an oversight on my part not an intentional deletion, so please
>>> re-raise the request.
>>> 2min - Mixed Reality Status Check[1]  - Joshua Bell
>>> 5min - Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review/Bashing, News - Barry Leiba,
>>> Joshua Bell
>>> 10min - Open Issues in "Introduction and Goals"  - Meadhbh Hamrick
>>> 10min - Open Issues in "Foundation"  - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark Lentczner
>>> 20min - Open Issues in "Abstract Type System"[2] - Meadhbh Hamrick/Mark
>>> Lentczner
>>> 5min - Status/Issues in "User Authentication"[3]  - Meadhbh Hamrick
>>> 5min - Status/Issues in"Client Application Launch Message"  - Meadhbh
>>> Hamrick
>>> 5min - Status/Issues in "Deployment and Trust Patterns" - David W Levine
>>> 5min - Cable Beach and VWRAP  - John Hurliman
>>> 5min - Virtual World Accessibility[4] - Katherine Mancuso
>>> 5min - What's NOT in VWRAP (a dissection of the Linden "Legacy" Protocol)
>>>  - Joshua Bell
>>> 5min - Next Steps - Barry Leiba, Joshua Bell
>>> [1] this is NOT to diagnose/fix issues; it's simply to confirm that a
>>> channel is functional or not, and redirect participants appropriately
>>> [2] Including implementation experiences, possibly by John Hurliman
>>> [3] Should include discussion on OAuth
>>> [4] Tentative, based on the scheduling of our session
>>> Feedback appreciated:
>>> * What to add to the agenda
>>> * What to drop from the agenda
>>> * Time allotments/priorities
>>> * Overall order (I have Meadhbh/Mark on the podium for a long period of
>>> time; break it up a bit?)
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>