IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 03 August 2016 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B59612D185; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EaQVwqcGd0Vt; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8576112D18D; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u73AR9Ll027692; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:27:09 +0100
Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u73AR7eL027652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:27:08 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Zhoutianran' <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAB4uO_wwbLPwjiKrcTh4d6sH72YYVfWK7HYi00VOUUQe_pp6NQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB4uO_wwbLPwjiKrcTh4d6sH72YYVfWK7HYi00VOUUQe_pp6NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:27:05 +0100
Message-ID: <052301d1ed71$9591c220$c0b54660$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0524_01D1ED79.F7584D00"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLJHfFK0xcW7AndYfSaeYTT51aOwAIGsbb7njhuqwA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22490.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.719-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.719-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: IDdx3MBO6ECPrjM/ltMU+Vu4M/xm4KZe0Wobj8GkNVpF+YXPIqAdvo/Y 5tV+XOdai/ZTKtBM8/0qU8Y6u4R6X6OfOZHmSOFB5Gn3L+GlKl5RwfT2oEaYdMzteZfBULmQ7mc CKudx6srmP0EDE8v6opmT8JbbnAzejDaAM6vZx6G1PiMh4ZF39fAFUfHEEYJHDO+DX+rUwfbhLW +nuKkjllirrtXj7RGJ1Yd2Kh8nE0VSltvzpguVG9OEZs/2oH3cQR8ML/5xWaY2t/VKYO6s6u//v bMLiEkVnfCgnZR65gXocyiWIpet6KoO96Tfmapcndu3heVAxaMP4vBWNr0zgSA6eO+NDmAxJZ3D 0zKPh7H10yQNuo1OJZfucML7iAp6c1BeS/J6aN9dMrg609R9BKO4XjVpMlFdn+lpJmYuEaN7ltq yJvHgp/JOjUaxKXKqGSKDIgjU9nky499dCbQy8IoLoibgjVEX1WPYxCHVrqdgHzfrfdHEt4c0B5 OUL/u1M5qWMflCo4dwtismKfx+71mKiy1F9pgLuIwLnB3Aqp13Bf9JIqsoeA8YwboCQc88CE7se pEW6CvzbeV2VN8Li3ZBE86uj+Htoi8K/V7jzhlNVr4vdmCpztFpembubBCcuRjdZTD8Hxe7yLIk LI23qXb4Bm7FqQnLeKdvzrQKtCjA+jwY/tNg2xlLm7Fc/E3pveEm5pElaXTil13HY0ejnnlEDb1 OO87ou7C4hieFwVKAMuqetGVettLvsKjhs0ldIAcCikR3vq/zYraRjiAZ9Rq9unUOBVTZo4g5uF VwtV6DfqxpaODc31xMQzj7/tJ2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/7TeOnA9c04wXTBb5s0wE0T2UsgQ>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:27:27 -0000

I've been following this work and believe it is something the IETF should work on and that this is better than a good starting point for working group work.
 
I can't promise that I will devote much attention to the work as it progresses, but I will participate in occasional reviews. I've talked to Eliot about some of the privacy trade-offs involved and I believe he understands my concerns.
 
Adrian
 
Dear OPSAWG,

The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud


The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.

Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).

Regards,
Warren and Tianran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email