IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0A312DF3B; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxBIuswogDEl; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4EE412DF39; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6570; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471445519; x=1472655119; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=VnYp6NBgNAaDAc0kkMH5NKUigsuY3nmPj/7yWEONfok=; b=JUgDKjXB9TCtDOHvOCi3Q+h3pCiSid9Y8dqPC717B49n1KQydU4X4/OI JLAEL9GhwOiaptX7yfF9SWkyT0H+B/RMb+eEwYTCFOl2tEcHIDqKLoV75 mLDcLLo423xGRYm+x/RmlXTd4wJXLQa54g1v/suwymgkx5XaaO94IPLH+ 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,529,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="641571161"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2016 14:51:57 +0000
Received: from [10.61.64.2] (ams3-vpn-dhcp2.cisco.com [10.61.64.2]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7HEpuMx026990; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:51:57 GMT
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAHw9_iJCfy0pd+K4ZJUVK=TAfZhEv71FzwfCO-f7upcbb4Upjw@mail.gmail.com> <4844553e-7647-0547-0b4a-581822f789d1@cisco.com> <CAHw9_i+=z-sLvi7reanuNe93F-+OYyA3dBADm3mA81VRGSH46w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <23040575-2297-fb4d-0917-6934122cbcb3@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:51:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+=z-sLvi7reanuNe93F-+OYyA3dBADm3mA81VRGSH46w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ej6WSbMx5OTvhWaOVCHprrWsLcqD8cKg"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/_tkqsEGnSoWH9Q0c2XlmK7c9scY>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:52:01 -0000


On 8/17/16 4:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com
> <mailto:lear@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks, Warren.  Before we do that, I would like to make two
>     proposals,
>     to keep things moving (and I'm not quite sure of order here);
>
>     First, and hopefully most trivially, I propose just to capture a point
>     or two more from the expired informational document.  This would be
>     non-normative text.  I think much of it is there, but would like to
>     remove the outdated reference.   Should take a few days.
>
>
> Sure.
>
>  
>
>
>     Second, and hopefully not that more of a controversy, I would like to
>     request early IANA assignments to assist with interoperable
>     development.  These would be listed in the IANA considerations section
>     of the current draft.  If we need a WG draft to make this happen,
>     that's
>     fine with me, but we should do a quick rev after the assignments.
>
>
> I believe that this *can* be accomplished without it being a WG doc,
> but it is better / cleaner / easier if we make it a WG doc and then
> ask for early assistant. We are fine with lots of revisions / it being
> submitted and then quickly revised.

Ok.  Will publish shortly what we have.

>
> Oh, please also confirm (all authors) that any needed IPR disclosures
> have been made...

From my perspective, this is the case.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email