IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F083612DADE; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SWOPKrfECXvZ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4D412DAC0; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470228257; x=1471437857; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=12gvA4Yn+hHkN7/9YS0y5dnIXS5i2UrdTLuyMOnsleI=; b=L5Z+rcgB6TnI5pppttUx8f1EBatjCoZyUODqPoLyPBxv32+3USv9mV9I lMubGjLDXS+p0EHUUAIWO7L4QBglBMfAObZNQIe/c0z1WIqpb4iEbaCM0 QPn5McSspYyYe0iTyWuMgeGnLNUW/goBigAiWhqG21j5My5wVEICapp0B E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DlCgA95qFX/xbLJq1chEW3cYQMhh0CggkQAQEBAQEBAV0nhF4BAQQBDhVCFBALGCoCAlcGAQwIAQGIJQivI480AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQ6IIgiCTYdBgloBBIgdhy6JaYM6gXCJVYlUhWyQJzUfg3w6iQ4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,465,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="680848594"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2016 12:44:15 +0000
Received: from [10.61.193.171] ([10.61.193.171]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u73CiFJF015302; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:44:15 GMT
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <516a0b0e-9d6f-0aba-9621-64741f92220f@bwijnen.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <616334f9-9e26-ec5f-2923-6d4be20f0d08@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:44:14 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <516a0b0e-9d6f-0aba-9621-64741f92220f@bwijnen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PeA58XhSmuDjjsPEaCb1tLfjejLmiaDOD"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/z5xTeH5YkHtSjHkc1jEZ9rTqYT0>
Cc: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:44:20 -0000

Hi Bert,


On 8/3/16 12:54 PM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
> Mmmmm
>
> - first I wonder why this document has "netmod" in the draftname".
>   it is targeted at opsawg, and besides, it not only has a YANG
>   datamodel, but also talks bout DHCP, x509 and LLDP.
>   So people should be aware that this is more than just YANG data model.

Long history.  Short answer is that if approved it would be renamed
accordingly, and if you see content that seemingly focuses just too much
on the model, then we should balance it off.  To that end...

> - the document also refers to draft-lear-mud-framework-00 (now expired)
>   in the introduction section. So should we also adopt that document
>   or is its content now included (or will it be included) in this
>   document that we want to adopt as opsawg work item?

We haven't updated the framework doc because we've been consolidating
all the other ones into one work.  I would be perfectly happy to
continue that consolidation (it would be non-normative text as the
framework is).

>
> I do support this work in opsawg, but would like to see above 2 points
> clarified. I am willing to review future versions

Thanks,

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email