IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 16 August 2016 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B473212D091 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7jpVvofz23B for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3015D12D0B7 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f123so81331390qkd.1 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KwnyEeCrkM43060km2eW2etxheM5i9zbjmGx3obzR5E=; b=pzSqGJKAWm0VF8LMRKUyy0T6HIuF8kRn63nkpnJKAsdkKew29cBoEX48Ea9vrGxIMR ZrGTUqzvj7xbQvl6iSmAoANN1y5pnzkuv1gBOYUWEA09yZy9DsOzxfXGKK8HZOKWInuE bkIZbRgoEl29cR/Zz20wfHOz7HmoO2+8Rk/IquTZ2Rt5wYEUkDHM7R3dhk7koV2+PMhT ivjK2NYkS84Hbhj6dVvHRKKLKSdPmYNnXevK1uQpIDNkO3VPdd9TetCBW0mpj/suHsZw rclv8alqGFumFFyEEQeUNr622cUOQeXKP8DjHGpao/l8gCLlEBb9ArBo3Ho7DQWlJ/qi Ldlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KwnyEeCrkM43060km2eW2etxheM5i9zbjmGx3obzR5E=; b=RbC7NKKvh1Uvz06nVzZ3KTNxOjMfA7pY5RjhrNFjsMBMR88sPK3D3sb69LzTbsfm0Z IXDgQSMaEsTGNNsSTwWaSp8V15b4lwmZN7horYqjED7LlHL65nSJ38j58OHqTF3w2UWk ENrRQb3KZAy2sd+ilL0qpHpvxxTcodsf+hXRQ/R8FD73nr+3AmcL6LBs799ApVB96CqS VHQff+2gGjL48Vo8l5Gehto1xz3+LbUfGPfl5NNQhV49bA+fi+bb+ECqPUcJiZDixFIm QzxpGXgk6BU7FPEhKCILAjhsT0sE9oXyVZbk+kSndT60tzcEkHfZJ4sFfUnlSwjdSaWE XfWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvJll/qXtgSbPzQCXJ0+Br7e1LdV00D4FFCm9237uW2AguATqhewTPQ1Wqs33Uopvi74YT6ts4dAEztFtop
X-Received: by 10.55.156.135 with SMTP id f129mr40629253qke.155.1471376045221; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.176.199 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:33:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJCfy0pd+K4ZJUVK=TAfZhEv71FzwfCO-f7upcbb4Upjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/8bAuZpAJSmJU5iZwAS5FSQzoP4Y>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:34:09 -0000

Dear OpsAWG,

We see sufficient interest to go play in the MUD.

Authors, please resubmit the document named draft-ietf-opsawg-mud (or
something similar, this ain't yer first rodeo).

While I have folks attention -- please remember to also review the
TACACS+ document - we wish to WGLC it soon.


W

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:
> Dear OPSAWG,
>
> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>
>
> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>
> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).
>
> Regards,
> Warren and Tianran



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email