Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

Mmmmm

- first I wonder why this document has "netmod" in the draftname".
   it is targeted at opsawg, and besides, it not only has a YANG
   datamodel, but also talks bout DHCP, x509 and LLDP.
   So people should be aware that this is more than just YANG data model.
- the document also refers to draft-lear-mud-framework-00 (now expired)
   in the introduction section. So should we also adopt that document
   or is its content now included (or will it be included) in this
   document that we want to adopt as opsawg work item?

I do support this work in opsawg, but would like to see above 2 points
clarified. I am willing to review future versions

Bert

On 03/08/16 09:14, Zhoutianran wrote:
> Dear OPSAWG,
>
> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>
>
> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>
> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).
>
> Regards,
> Warren and Tianran
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>