IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 10 August 2016 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AAA12D0EC; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gcMuOZj2ePSG; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4097212D14A; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2300; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470855662; x=1472065262; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=sugPUJi9n5rAte1qAEpw30hLbDDGheO8pOB0AmXHg7I=; b=lULjsSqvVuPwWbluAMbscev5ia866Px0SsL9fv22mgPAL42+N+6RUKrv GVsUkKMfcYhSHtIaxfhJbR4h40CSeXrgYtfThKr5Yhb8tM0nXrgI+6c+E cdd/yDgBNv/EC9Q7tDNIN8FW9TgXPD4nqANMQvL5O3/Oqrueg6FM5dBaP c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A2AgAYeatX/4wNJK1dg0VWbQ8HtxOCD4F9JIV5AoFfOBQBAQEBAQEBXSeEXgEBBAF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBQ6IGwgOwhUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEOCQWIIoJVh2yCLwWILItMhUQBgzqBc2+IdYFrhFuIfYw0g3cBHjaDem6GIX8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,501,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="309154760"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Aug 2016 19:01:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7AJ11i9025707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:01:01 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:01:00 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:01:00 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
Thread-Index: AQHR8zmIxESeOheXIUGCqDbb6Xy5nQ==
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:01:00 +0000
Message-ID: <5E723E93-C391-4DF6-BF6A-FF656DAE28FE@cisco.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <e57fb132-3f02-372e-01ae-352b57f28988@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <e57fb132-3f02-372e-01ae-352b57f28988@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.119]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E59BABA7-FD08-40A1-A50B-1CD93EC6436E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/iXK7aF4j_FYZYGW35cP65mTG364>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:01:11 -0000

I would agree.

> On Aug 3, 2016, at 5:38 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> On 8/3/16 03:14, Zhoutianran wrote:
>> Dear OPSAWG,
>> 
>> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
>> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>> 
>> 
>> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>> 
>> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).
> 
> I feel this work should be adopted, and opsawg is a good place for it.
> 
> Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email