IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7AB12B029; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3wtCsLzpr91; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2547C12D0C9; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=812; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470227922; x=1471437522; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzuhRJvcL+lT/z9kJ6DooewflrhApvTMUG7WS8gAAu8=; b=EG3UEUP9dRhUw2uocv35H4Kel7Bc2f427tfduVYBNm34wVWp1DBySkTi AeXdKm8jAx5BdW04GQUUidtDhToemGkZV4zJ/8BiZRdBezd6S35L2zgGt TWWopzv6Y2qOIfdK3KteCFGTHd/XWvGfYWXwCmx/A95uT4sOh1KhMO1kn k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D6DADP5KFX/4gNJK1cg0VWKrdxhAwkhXkCgU07EQEBAQEBAQFdJ4RfAQU4QRALGC5XBgEMCAEBiC0OvkcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFhiqBeIJVihsBBIgrkQmGGIhngWuEW4MOhWyQJzQghBYgiQ4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,465,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="305446065"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Aug 2016 12:38:41 +0000
Received: from [10.118.87.89] (rtp-jclarke-nitro8.cisco.com [10.118.87.89]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u73CceuT027396; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:38:41 GMT
To: Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Message-ID: <e57fb132-3f02-372e-01ae-352b57f28988@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:38:41 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/RSE4_k2H9d_9LCrcAX5Vcn0ZTOo>
Cc: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:38:44 -0000

On 8/3/16 03:14, Zhoutianran wrote:
> Dear OPSAWG,
>
> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>
>
> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>
> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).

I feel this work should be adopted, and opsawg is a good place for it.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email