Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

I support the adoption of this draft, and consider myself properly warned regarding future requests for reviews. :-)

Thanks,
Brian

> On Aug 10, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just a reminder that this call for adoption is still ongoing, and
> closes on August 16th.
> 
> So far we see strong support for adoption, but would welcome more[0].
> 
> W
> [0]: Partly so we have a pool of victims^w volunteers to ask for review.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:
>> Dear OPSAWG,
>> 
>> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
>> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>> 
>> 
>> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>> 
>> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Warren and Tianran
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

-- 
Brian Weis
Security, CSG, Cisco Systems
Telephone: +1 408 526 4796
Email: bew@cisco.com