IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 10 August 2016 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBA612D5D7 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbI2uugvetNJ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74EF1127078 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id t7so46877989qkh.0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=skFwepi3KDeEl/iqZQ82hZJ72v4OOmmMiaYaQzRIIdI=; b=cMDIzOmbEhjHGBu9LFQqEcxXadOpFCCRUcRGn588Qo5yv4phItSEUQucq9j55I2bRR GcAYZZR1shi9UX+TZv6PDHSOwx+zsfcQLcv2ciFlifZZ7L8FMiejCjVmoha96q6la+P0 XS6lptYZrJDGr/YHXYNe/aOIRi6nb3maY+yY+4W5LytwxYoy3bJ7aI6il9+jMrUzUFfP TgpTUpzJ0D47FQTGagJZiSaWu7EmcDfpIcjsPv/knax2RFu536jzdeLFvMJsbOo21hwP mIhsONt3zechmZ1A6mR6PCttfLd0u8LKNuV6X4EfDLMCAHaqMea1bHgz9unv2oPqHmZi BxxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=skFwepi3KDeEl/iqZQ82hZJ72v4OOmmMiaYaQzRIIdI=; b=AcJGIAnF4nxNVmY08nnVquFaOhutrsk1FhZJCDol7Lv8F5WbWDpspkGsALizmuNbzI bZy/RMAESpfq/enSZMIzg3km+Yo8eBQHDdmX3uPr7Ww23EmXju6FS+ZFzP/JfkrrGlqj H3dA+vcv5KMWo5sodX2EamfMID0PPScJNCkb+OZSUGPhudfgzX/pWkTU1gfL5GKOyP4a nISbmwwFLuymCEVIg19g6eTmmRXG+vPH5pIDceqfnHkaQMAUZkRrEgq0oHQbY1tkQKW9 oFAKVY0KvqFj1H7u9hO/moG3TRozD58pN+Dy1lCjk3CLY+fzYR0LCIvCrCh/4IDlxqWg Koxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu7kjdXE7SV15pmzEpbwuz6KfWx8sbXJjf7wWpaGxViXD4jczTgPKiiFLDYvW93HAx22K8rpnPwJJTSbJU5
X-Received: by 10.55.198.135 with SMTP id s7mr5131162qkl.203.1470842466366; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.176.199 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183C2A939@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:20:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKA9z3v067JMPTjyx0Ksu7DRpabDg=V0i6JFTi3x51Aww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/KN8m1abpO-36RTTNwjOasjTGJAQ>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adoption poll for draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:28:30 -0000

Hi all,

Just a reminder that this call for adoption is still ongoing, and
closes on August 16th.

So far we see strong support for adoption, but would welcome more[0].

W
[0]: Partly so we have a pool of victims^w volunteers to ask for review.



On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:
> Dear OPSAWG,
>
> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>
>
> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>
> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).
>
> Regards,
> Warren and Tianran



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email