Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet

Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Mon, 10 February 1992 20:45 UTC

To: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Reply-To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: yeongw@psi.com, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wpp-camayocs@nisc.psi.net
Subject: Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Feb 92 19:34:20 GMT." <9202101934.AA05371@nisc.psi.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 12:35:32 -0800
Message-Id: <23545.697754132@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>

Tsk.  Tsk.  Steve - NADF175 doesn't have flaws, it just doesn't fit in with
your model of what the DIT should be.  Earlier versions of NADF175 have
been dissemminated for comment for over a year now.  I've yet to see a
show-stopper or anything that wasn't dealth with by better wording...

/mtr

X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Christian Huitema
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Christian Huitema
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Christian Huitema
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Christian Huitema
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Tim Howes
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Christian Huitema
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Einar Stefferud
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet S.Kille
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Marshall Rose
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet yeongw
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet S.Kille
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Einar Stefferud
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Richard Colella
Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille