IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

"xiechf@chinatelecom.cn" <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> Mon, 22 June 2020 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F113A0A19 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvu_nqLpH4lC for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA873A0BA3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:18354.769242353
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.75?logid-3bfc65fbb55d47959211bb65ff18a66a (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 05D7D2800DE; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:23:56 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040161@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id 3bfc65fbb55d47959211bb65ff18a66a for dhruv.ietf@gmail.com; Mon Jun 22 16:23:58 2020
X-Transaction-ID: 3bfc65fbb55d47959211bb65ff18a66a
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:23:55 +0800
From: "xiechf@chinatelecom.cn" <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>, <001301d6486d$f3a8cf10$dafa6d30$@com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.16.188[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020062216235528379261@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart636577434824_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/0jOcV7p7MDGG9UEX_xOU4KuKc3M>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:24:10 -0000

Hi，WG, 
I support WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks

Chongfeng 

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2020年6月7日 15:45
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
 
Hi WG,
 
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/0
6/
 
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
the list.
 
This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.
 
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email