IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

qinfengwei <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A278F3A0A1A for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkA6sDU-WINV for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE113A0A19 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45ef069bce34-1f1ff; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:20:13 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45ef069bce34-1f1ff
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[117.136.38.141]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea5ef069bc3b1-adffb; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:20:13 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea5ef069bc3b1-adffb
From: qinfengwei <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, pce@ietf.org
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:20:12 +0800
Message-ID: <001301d6486d$f3a8cf10$dafa6d30$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHWPJ/cBKWpRantdkSGAvcfXYtuXqjkYl8g
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/10XqfNpe9d4XnwUlWcVkhFRKkzU>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:20:51 -0000

Yes, Support.


Thanks，
Fengwei Qin

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2020年6月7日 15:45
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/0
6/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
the list.

This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email