IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

"Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6E13A09BC for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joa2NPiCcEfJ for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B323A096B for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml713-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9E767331C14F21F15F97; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:15:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) by lhreml713-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:15:15 +0100
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.98) by dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:15:12 +0800
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) by dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:15:12 +0800
From: "Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
Thread-Index: AQHWPJ/cD2ri6Fk0tU6Jq9fE+8pJ1qjjyl8g
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:15:12 +0000
Message-ID: <e86584a7e0ff470abc76d9d0e3512db8@huawei.com>
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.157]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/xu_7GgrLXre_FPqUKkB046tmXsw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:15:22 -0000

Yes, Support.
The work of PCEP extension to support association among candidate paths of SR policy is useful in SR deployment. 

Best Regards
Xuesong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 3:45 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
> 
> 
> Hi WG,
> 
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/
> 
> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you
> willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
> 
> This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.
> 
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email