IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 12 June 2020 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E85D3A08B6 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQ2yr2TpcxFL for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4313A0884 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id i25so9004820iog.0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0sCWHJBakj9Y7Q01yBKIz4/2Wp8hcwzao2htZnW37H8=; b=V59dlPixqMOIzmrhi0T7ikPo+o/pg6tWVa4AKIVjyzD2fFUO1jv23k/1cUEEjMnKVp WXNRra8Eh29/ecIPZDr9ZLMfNxbQm01s17I64HyaLOs0m4XjDiH/e0zxJXmbSIrqZJdf KyjnyTnAsvtCk8TwNX97pVc7xmNQX9ua1nOG6ibhBRDL4gMiRB4W4X/2Ub5G6/ciC9Q7 JTNwvUZ/lJxw78pz8WLOQC/gD+fUOaJiSY7bfjD1Mp2XFtGB9zeG5zjqhYUcOHO28wfR oy2gVu4N6nmtQfJuvmNQWb+igI+GltvmuzgRiBxupeDDqueLJku709zxwRKoUxbX6Ut8 Ghuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0sCWHJBakj9Y7Q01yBKIz4/2Wp8hcwzao2htZnW37H8=; b=QeXoFVqGC4CiKhPguiwgp9AisRsohC91NFB6PBukaoUdHN08VmrUtwRqBVrLdKZSNb EI0zQd3YOffI3Mb01AIrSKLnVPP1yd43BhAZvYHc7dXNfApbEM9e6CfwxCB2jLtWQM+u G7IdvEIYSphn19gkQewlW5n0F5HbFhRghLgCvv47Q9CvY9dUMEsUKzgi8ryHDM6Qw31Q 0QtJxSggDxgQQWKbn/D0yIc95gik4l+tliqOEBx4Ma6B7Gbe7yAqsGBC2wg3XV9Q4uos 3T4WNY/M8ms5AFvAsQ90bplb1q/+KVzVy5SxZMIVENs7TkVuMbdVzRX7x4lWcC44dK4k 3cpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YPWZQ3sLL3SECsf6g8raVzH4Z0pYzA5N+n0iP+gvYAneffo61 WzLv7x8ZkcJa8HcPe1bacSmD5QqgR4ETQ4U7GsKOU68QJNQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+UhRnS1S+6LkoW4JPPRwsAHuQ5bFlawmWFhh5l9XW5RTNWVcDu+w6SjmkcustxRkNaS3f+cJRoXNnqg/OfWw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2ac9:: with SMTP id m9mr12010708iov.68.1591939045617; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com> <000001d64070$b1f86850$15e938f0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <000001d64070$b1f86850$15e938f0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:46:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5esP7wH2+w0nqokL84aL90f=RwSB_H22k7Gqtpdj2tpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CqFrHawuusH7d8irQkJbkKT8pds>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 05:17:28 -0000

Hi Aijun,

Just based on the new path setup type, the existing PCEP messages and
procedures can be used for the SR-MPLS and SRv6 paths (independent of
any SR policy information). That is described in RFC 8664 and
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6. Some of the work in PCE WG
predates the SR policy framework. To use the features of SR policy,
one would need to use the mechanism described in this I-D.

>   As mentioned in the document, although the color/endpoint is not included
> in the above documents, but these enhancements is not the main part of this
> draft?

Could you elaborate, what is the concern?

Thanks!
Dhruv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email