IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pearg] Research Group Last Call for "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques"

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA60E3A0864 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMLdCOc_gOqy for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC153A0AD4 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3973; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590758614; x=1591968214; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=JVRjcUZa4yEahrPkgk5OCTos1wIv7jy3sqXDeA22Trw=; b=IONFrXq79DSY9XKHAtDPaHoisU/dxENpTI1Lpg5IH6Ro+0yfI5Kh3i3Y HVcnu6oD/1lhPkpCKKBW7RZx+1lelOHZrLTaOcCW7dMRPK7UONpS+aM+e Iprol72vS9vb8pOOI3Tvomn7TWA7IVtgXg7HMQoaHLmC/wysmaD97MS/a k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CzAADWC9Fe/xbLJq1cChoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQESAQEBAQICAQEBAYIKgxhUASASLIQliQGHZSWTYogRBAcBAQEJAwEBJQoEAQGERAKCIyU4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FWQyFcgEBAQECARgFBlYFCwsEFCoCAlcGE4MmAYJcIA+vCnaBMoQ6AYEWhQkKBoE4gVOLDIIAgTgMEIIfLj6CZwEDgTaDQTOCLQSYN4ELiVqPKH+CXoJ6gSaUSx6QUo1CqwSDSQIEBgUCFYFqIoFWMxoIGxVlAYI+PhIZDZB4iE6FRD8DMAI1AgYBBwEBAwmNWAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,448,1583193600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="26626592"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 May 2020 13:23:30 +0000
Received: from [10.61.239.124] ([10.61.239.124]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04TDNTMp001607 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 May 2020 13:23:30 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <6309FE45-F0AE-4F82-8454-9361A0439A26@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7368866F-1E33-4827-A57E-7B1BF8F54AA0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:23:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <F78640DF-781F-42BA-ABCA-E3F839FA2893@eggert.org>
Cc: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <hall@isoc.org>, "pearg@irtf.org" <pearg@irtf.org>, Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
References: <08f43a37-2b7b-418e-95a8-ed57484c66be@www.fastmail.com> <F466D238-BCC9-476B-A876-1A72E5B1EEFD@cisco.com> <434A7CA0-DCE1-42A1-89B0-E9B8959B9343@isoc.org> <35B3B2B9-B1E7-41EF-B082-5F5EEF101B0D@cisco.com> <A05941FD-A44A-41DC-90ED-E79E6213700D@isoc.org> <79C21420-970E-46E2-9129-1886597924B1@cisco.com> <F78640DF-781F-42BA-ABCA-E3F839FA2893@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.239.124, [10.61.239.124]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/GXri7xU7vpEfXGfRtPpUeyFIQAg>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Research Group Last Call for "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques"
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:23:53 -0000

Hi Lars,

> On 2020-5-28, at 19:26, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> It would strengthen your case if you can identify a domain name seizure that is based on what we commonly view as censorship.  Otherwise skip the purpose.
> 
> I don't know who "we" here is, but there are certainly many cases where domain names have been seized that *some* consider censorship. For example: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/09/cat-domain-casualty-catalonian-independence-crackdown


That, to me, is a far better reference for several reasons:

It’s a clear attempt to interfere with information exchange by a government (that really ticks all the boxes for all the definitions I’ve seen).
It demonstrates both a physical seizure and a domain seizure.

Nice one!

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email