RE: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"

["Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <[e-mail]>]

Shouldn't the response say something about the expectation of experimentations? 

Bets regards
Hannu

-----Original Message-----
From: QUIC <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Waqar Zia
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 9:57 AM
To: Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>; QUIC WG <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"

Thanks Lars, Lucas for the draft reply.

Perhaps we can add one more sentence towards the very end to the effect:

*If there is any further update on this topic, IETF QUIC working group will liaise it to 3GPP.*

...so that 3GPP does not have to keep querying about this.

Thanks,
Waqar.

-----Original Message-----
From: QUIC <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
Sent: 08 December 2020 19:02
To: QUIC WG <[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"

Hi,

FYI, below is a draft of our intended response to the recent Liaison Statement "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions" which we intend to send next week.

Please feel free to send comments.

Thanks,
Lars and Lucas

--

Thank you for the update on your architectural design and your intended standardization timeline.

Multipath support for QUIC remains under active discussion in the IETF QUIC working group. While multiple design proposals for such an extension have been proposed, it remains uncertain for the time being if the WG will come to consensus on adopting a work item on multipath QUIC, and if so, which individual proposal it would be based on and whether or not it would satisfy your architectural design. We unfortunately also cannot predict whether the WG discussion will have sufficiently progressed by March 2021 for such a consensus to emerge.

Kind regards,
Lucas Pardue and Lars Eggert, QUIC Working Group chairs