Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 08 December 2020 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3AF3A1076 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:01:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUhC5MAt-QXH for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B123A1073 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:55a6:bb20:d0fc:d3d2] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:55a6:bb20:d0fc:d3d2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DF9F61088B for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:01:45 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1607450505; bh=hbUkaZgAbdJEulqg7OQe5h3ePi8l6Pg5KaknsRfnlJg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=z66EvJ72pUfrigpS5R+hWfrP7cf9FitNSPyvqblrbQAnIyorFZvrXa/iKDw8FaeiH bcscC0w9ykN4sZGLT53AU4hJTJ/e3283eXCjrlbzljEI/W3UjEG9CCXmvSLPse0v3p RONQKXorZQAqMT254yevSAMU4sY0/ixEJivVWSEA=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E85D77D6-8805-4908-B9A3-D7FC13E8E4B8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 20:01:43 +0200
References: <160675082221.16479.6130039061469494989@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOYVs2ogM86kasog5T7-XG3Nx3kZGx6Vi1id=O=0yK6WK3LHOg@mail.gmail.com> <7047_1606815783_5FC61027_7047_384_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E3A64B1F1@OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CANatvzwjyfrzoX6vA4S81hABQXcpYCJ7DWEDYBnNnRLFGWMgXg@mail.gmail.com> <LEJPR01MB0635396C6C147F869AFDCD14FAF40@LEJPR01MB0635.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <1927_1606850062_5FC6960E_1927_422_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E3A64C3E8@OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CACpbDceeYDNV7mDcj1x4w21UE3nJggoxp0vNTd8M-yn3ShhYDg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR02MB5176090F48871DD8E9FB9904F7F20@BYAPR02MB5176.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <LEJPR01MB0635AA0C1EF193B23922FFDFFAF20@LEJPR01MB0635.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <CACpbDccetebMK26uxGVVkn2HpONDoyTYSp0s=BApRN-FOr1SmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcdMu0Dd89X7dFrbaLjs8+QQ8nnkdTgxKuhacBBw7e7SpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcdMu0Dd89X7dFrbaLjs8+QQ8nnkdTgxKuhacBBw7e7SpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <5F4378EC-A74A-4445-80CF-DE00F5F847DE@eggert.org>
X-MailScanner-ID: 7DF9F61088B.A2E5E
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/zRwhy7eSj2RWp_ohfVEyUCQnDkc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 18:01:54 -0000

Hi,

FYI, below is a draft of our intended response to the recent Liaison Statement "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions" which we intend to send next week.

Please feel free to send comments.

Thanks,
Lars and Lucas

--

Thank you for the update on your architectural design and your intended standardization timeline.

Multipath support for QUIC remains under active discussion in the IETF QUIC working group. While multiple design proposals for such an extension have been proposed, it remains uncertain for the time being if the WG will come to consensus on adopting a work item on multipath QUIC, and if so, which individual proposal it would be based on and whether or not it would satisfy your architectural design. We unfortunately also cannot predict whether the WG discussion will have sufficiently progressed by March 2021 for such a consensus to emerge.

Kind regards,
Lucas Pardue and Lars Eggert, QUIC Working Group chairs