IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: QUIC re-chartering: include DNS-over-QUIC?

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 05 February 2020 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5513D120639 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:33:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRRs6r2UY06X for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8168C12026E for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8F166017A; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:33:28 +0200 (EET)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z4KlFBMoXxE2; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:33:26 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70738660150; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:33:26 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: QUIC re-chartering: include DNS-over-QUIC?
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMC_H0NTXCy+o+7MjH+RT0oB5UUQL0PiqKFVMiu9w2NExw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:33:24 +0100
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8FD478B2-4FB5-451F-9402-A278186C4E63@piuha.net>
References: <A56547B6-2E3B-4ABE-8C9B-BA9ACC489FB2@mnot.net> <CAKC-DJiuhJurq4ojJwPD0Ag3Eoz_4KwFssuuP5Ts1+EH6C9C2A@mail.gmail.com> <0FD71EED-6095-4989-A81B-1FEC12044E80@apple.com> <CA+9kkMC_H0NTXCy+o+7MjH+RT0oB5UUQL0PiqKFVMiu9w2NExw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/oMTWO4oDSkLticp_A6J40J-FLTQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:33:32 -0000

I share Tommy’s and Ekr’s questions and thoughts on this. I think you are right Ted that DoQ is probably more straightforward and has less components. However, I also feel that the number of DNS query transport solutions is growing :-) and that it might be worthwhile for us to think about which of these have sufficient market demand. I thought DoH (and DoH3 as a natural version of that) had a standing, which other ones do?

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email