IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Extended IDs

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB76712940D; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:33:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m25aHO5eMqH4; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C508124319; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:32:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1014; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513265570; x=1514475170; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Un5rWqSXQH1gZxEJ3wHh4nasAGgCXKkhS4aby/n9wR4=; b=SdQTBTUI8IEgfxMnBMPIukMpgMnJef5ivrAcw2rB1U2klERiVWwmyGSv KqDm9NfRg+WUPIswdhIRkzTgIwoix5d5DwlAv3VkvLtHfKFAZfxZJDTTd O9PYCq+K0znjBwCaLI+Au1ZIxIjzfdYwaJMHwhpDZ2pTArdbthsYUY89Q I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A4AgCbmDJa/4YNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+gVonB4N7mSeBfZcWghUKhTsCGoRdQRYBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUjAQEBAQIBIxFFEAIBCBgCAiYCAgIwFRACBA4FiiIIqH2CJ4peAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYEPglGCDoZqgy+BbheCfoJjBaMlApUok2yWQAIRGQGBOgEmAy+BTm8VgmOEVniJNoEVAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,400,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="321979031"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Dec 2017 15:32:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBEFWnAA016469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:32:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:32:48 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:32:48 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
CC: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, "radext-ads@ietf.org" <radext-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [radext] Extended IDs
Thread-Index: AQHTaFBxQlK83f2iTECUdzRYa7wpJqMsVBUAgAFpdmCAASVyAIAAH4CAgAWDQYCADMOagIAAEIWAgAH74YD//7W0AIAAVHQA//+w/QA=
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:32:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D65802B4.E17D3%acee@cisco.com>
References: <fef698a5-9802-c9be-04d7-1e869651c988@restena.lu> <dfd0ff02-c9e8-7253-4fb4-1e6def3e93b2@restena.lu> <8BD2C2F2-D42E-4B84-8F86-3A803160DD74@cisco.com> <b6ed7a87de434ea4a39f584a92e933b9@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <285C5C94-578E-4293-81A2-9D73E1105ABE@deployingradius.com> <8DE62B3C-D2FA-4467-9CCE-7F8D039B87E2@cisco.com> <alpine.WNT.2.21.1.1712041849350.2252@smurf> <c75160a5-1196-bdbd-f313-108085ea0c37@restena.lu> <D65692C4.E13AA%acee@cisco.com> <cf5f59f1-c2ba-9dad-7ce0-c2afdd8e55e4@restena.lu> <D657FE58.E17B6%acee@cisco.com> <3DD57A26-3B4F-4EAB-AC6E-CB2F0126B917@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DD57A26-3B4F-4EAB-AC6E-CB2F0126B917@deployingradius.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C8F5B326AEDA2F43B7CA1A8459BE72D9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/8CS_g97YS6rpqWOy4jq6QXnRAPU>
Subject: Re: [radext] Extended IDs
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:33:01 -0000


On 12/14/17, 10:15 AM, "Alan DeKok" <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:

>On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Of course, I meant a WG individual contributor and not a contributor to
>> the documents. Normally, you’d speak "as a chair" only when you are
>> addressing WG process and not when you are making technical comments.
>
>  To be fair, deciding which topics are on point is part of the WG
>process, and within the bounds of a chairs discretion.

While they are no longer in the thread, these were clearly technical
comments as to how RADIUS works and is deployed. These comments should
stand on their own merit and not the chair position.

Acee  

>
>  Alan DeKok.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email