IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Extended IDs

Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> Sat, 09 December 2017 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF34126C25 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 08:27:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uej-mFUYI6vr for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 08:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2733129353 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 08:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crashant.home (host31-53-99-35.range31-53.btcentralplus.com [31.53.99.35]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA81338D for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ACFD6EFE-375B-4CD8-8667-CAD71C9A6089"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:26:54 +0000
References: <fef698a5-9802-c9be-04d7-1e869651c988@restena.lu> <dfd0ff02-c9e8-7253-4fb4-1e6def3e93b2@restena.lu>
To: radext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <dfd0ff02-c9e8-7253-4fb4-1e6def3e93b2@restena.lu>
Message-Id: <0A8C8EAE-BB3D-4751-AFFC-645AF662E28C@freeradius.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/WQpLIO1QWvKIkCSl0hIYkz3oN-A>
Subject: Re: [radext] Extended IDs
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:27:02 -0000

Hi Stefan,

My vote is for draft-dekok-radext-request-authenticator-02.

I think the implementation will be simpler in the majority of cases and I see no issues with overloading the authenticator field.

-Arran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email