IETF Logo Mail Archive

[radext] FW: Extended IDs

Albert Tian <albert.tian@ericsson.com> Sun, 10 December 2017 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <albert.tian@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2383A127522 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 12:54:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVFi5vnQQkbR for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 12:54:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84972124217 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 12:54:09 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-8efff70000004288-bd-5a2d9eefe771
Received: from EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.87]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AF.91.17032.FEE9D2A5; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:54:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:54:06 -0500
From: Albert Tian <albert.tian@ericsson.com>
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
CC: "albert.tian@ercisson.com" <albert.tian@ercisson.com>
Thread-Topic: [radext] Extended IDs
Thread-Index: AQHTcfkEe06hzIa0vUur41f77feu7A==
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:54:06 +0000
Message-ID: <5E3E39D8-DF21-4BBF-980F-AC2E1EE4A661@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.11]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5E3E39D8DF214BBF980FAC2E1EE4A661ericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupkkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonXPfDPN0og6/dwhbnDpxjsmh5NZPN gcmjYf4ONo8lS34yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGXs2d3EVDB9DWPFzl/N7A2Mp5YzdjFyckgI mEgc6r3P3sXIxSEkcIRR4veaXawQznJGiba+32wgVWwCOhKvZj8A6xARUJe49PMaM4jNLGAp 8f7LXVYQW1hASeLljS9QNcoSnZ+mQdl6Ev1rOtlBbBYBVYlz12+CzeQVsJd4PfkhmM0oICbx /dQaJoiZ4hK3nsxngrhOQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/8B2iQLN/HR7NQtEXEni4+/57BC9yRJ7u0+w Q8wXlDg58wnLBEbhWUjGzkJSNgtJ2SxGDqC4psT6XfoQJYoSU7ofskPYGhKtc+ZC2dYSZxZN ZENWs4CRYxUjR2lxQU5uupHBJkZgBB2TYNPdwXh/uuchRgEORiUe3mWtulFCrIllxZW5hxgl OJiVRHhN/YBCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTEec948kYJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUa GC3+iL8+cXYXl6SqUsa8m3WtHi5LBH2V7b++PGz8ebOBTSlrv4rsryt3M1cpmf/j2+YhuMNh 7m6RA5zbDWZ5Tdv5sqJ6zrobX92ZE0y3GFruvL2rbsmdG1su3HjjsKPI/9Lx81e9D82eXl9o yCt2+ugya/1ZNZnXvtvEbJ4Tvdvkz+QCVbsk5U4lluKMREMt5qLiRACvmL+7nAIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/WJIgPflOgRsXEhcu4kHvgjhEuDM>
Subject: [radext] FW: Extended IDs
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:54:12 -0000

Hi

I have read both solutions, and I think both would work. Still I prefer draft-chen-radext-identifier-attr-02, as I think an explicit extended ID attribute would help trouble-shooting in deployments.

Thanks,
Albert




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [radext] Extended IDs
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:54:32 +0100
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu<mailto:stefan.winter@restena.lu>>
To: radext@ietf.org<mailto:radext@ietf.org>

Hello,

> thanks all for raising the awareness of these two drafts.
>
>
> I think it would be good if all remaining readers of this list who care
> enough now take some time to read both drafts and make up their mind on
> what the preferred approach is.
>
>
> In approx. two weeks' time I will start a call for adoption on both
> drafts, and hopefully there are enough responses to make the exercise
> meaningful. If so, the one with more votes wins.

Now that was a relaxed "two weeks" delay. My apologies, I've been on and
off work for a while, with substantial backlogs.

This email starts a two week call for adoption of at most one of the
following two drafts:

* draft-chen-radext-identifier-attr-02
* draft-dekok-radext-request-authenticator-02

Since the two drafts treat the same topic, at most one can be selected
to serve as the basis for future work.

In your reply to this call for adoption, please indicate which of the
two drafts you think should be adopted. You can of course also indicate
that none of the two are fit for purpose. The only thing you really
shouldn't do is to vote for both; that wouldn't help the discussion move on.

Please reply by 12 dec 2017 2400 UTC.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

--
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche
2, avenue de l'Université
L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email