Re: [radext] Extended IDs

Hi, Stefan:

Here is my count of the votes:

13 for draft-chen-radext-identifier-attr-02
 6 for draft-dekok-radext-request-authenticator-02

Is this correct?

Thanks.  -- Enke

On 11/28/17 5:54 AM, Stefan Winter wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>> thanks all for raising the awareness of these two drafts.
>>
>>
>> I think it would be good if all remaining readers of this list who care
>> enough now take some time to read both drafts and make up their mind on
>> what the preferred approach is.
>>
>>
>> In approx. two weeks' time I will start a call for adoption on both
>> drafts, and hopefully there are enough responses to make the exercise
>> meaningful. If so, the one with more votes wins.
> 
> Now that was a relaxed "two weeks" delay. My apologies, I've been on and
> off work for a while, with substantial backlogs.
> 
> This email starts a two week call for adoption of at most one of the
> following two drafts:
> 
> * draft-chen-radext-identifier-attr-02
> * draft-dekok-radext-request-authenticator-02
> 
> Since the two drafts treat the same topic, at most one can be selected
> to serve as the basis for future work.
> 
> In your reply to this call for adoption, please indicate which of the
> two drafts you think should be adopted. You can of course also indicate
> that none of the two are fit for purpose. The only thing you really
> shouldn't do is to vote for both; that wouldn't help the discussion move on.
> 
> Please reply by 12 dec 2017 2400 UTC.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Stefan Winter
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
> 