Re: [Resolverless-dns] Paper on Resolver-less DNS

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E041112002E for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DAmeFGqy1oN1 for <resolverless-dns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9155A120052 for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.200.2.180] (sdzac10-108-1-nat.nje.twosigma.com [8.2.105.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FB5929D64F for <resolverless-dns@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <3bb2711b-8b9e-d921-a3cf-8b5a34bdc234@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:38:38 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
Message-Id: <471959C9-782F-49B6-BA6A-2E45E56D4CD8@dukhovni.org>
References: <54892F22-27E4-4444-9CC8-2D9E84A9668F@dukhovni.org> <4ec7dd1d-e914-0adb-4240-296f2f762b5f@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <ADC6E119-0EED-4990-A975-F594C9282872@dukhovni.org> <64650d58-924f-c0f3-d181-614d59527477@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <20190830053023.GE90696@straasha.imrryr.org> <f81ec73d-879e-0427-e11b-0973e01034c3@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <20190902213241.GI70599@straasha.imrryr.org> <88cef6e4-73bd-7324-8509-a1acbd77750e@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <CA+nkc8CLO7TwB1zFstjSCGNBvWUaBX1E2uvBQOkSMEAmFxP3yA@mail.gmail.com> <726fa997-8b7c-495e-623a-ccb299e36c1f@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <20190904145018.GO70599@straasha.imrryr.org> <c00d6128-781e-4ad9-bee2-83d6e7e863ac@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <F4A6ABCA-2C6B-4D3A-986B-B043BEA09EFB@dukhovni.org> <3bb2711b-8b9e-d921-a3cf-8b5a34bdc234@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
To: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/resolverless-dns/8gQUCyyokEwDC7dBFaEdxd3wWLk>
Subject: Re: [Resolverless-dns] Paper on Resolver-less DNS
X-BeenThere: resolverless-dns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Resolverless DNS <resolverless-dns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/resolverless-dns/>
List-Post: <mailto:resolverless-dns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/resolverless-dns>, <mailto:resolverless-dns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 22:38:43 -0000

> On Sep 4, 2019, at 6:16 PM, Erik Sy <sy@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>; wrote:
> 
>> You lose me at "conversion rate", and other exploitative metrics.
> 
> Note, that the linked study refers to online shopping. You may
> understand it as the revenue of online shops increases by 7% if the
> website load time decreases by 100ms.

Perhaps my original point was not clear:

  * I don't choose browsers by looking to maximize the revenue of online stores.
  * Nor should be a priority for the IETF.

But this is perhaps a distraction, let's move on...

-- 
	Viktor.